Derivation of the Lorentz force, QM

ag_swe
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Studying in the Heisenberg picture, we have

\frac{\text{d}x_i}{\text{d}t}=-\frac{\text{i}}{\hbar}[x_i,H]=\frac{1}{m}\left(p_i-\frac{q}{c}A_i\right)

where the last bracket is known as the kinematic momentum \pi. Now, to find \frac{\text{d}^2{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t^2} I do the following:

\frac{\text{d}^2{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t^2} = [\frac{\text{d}{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t},H]<br /> =[\frac{\pi}{m},\frac{\pi^2}{2m}+q\Phi]=

\frac{\pi}{m}(\frac{\pi^2}{2m}+q\Phi)-(\frac{\pi^2}{2m}+q\Phi)\frac{\pi}{m}=

\frac{\pi}{m}q\Phi-q\Phi\frac{\pi}{m}=

\frac{q}{m}(-\text{i}\hbar\nabla-\frac{q}{c}{\bf{A}})\Phi-\frac{q}{m}\Phi(-\text{i}\hbar\nabla-\frac{q}{c}{\bf{A}})

\frac{\text{i}\hbar q}{m}{\bf{E}}-\frac{q^2}{mc}{\bf{A}}\Phi+\frac{\text{i}\hbar q}{m}\Phi \nabla+\frac{q^2}{mc}\Phi {\bf{A}}=?

The correct expression should be

\frac{\text{d}^2{\bf{x}}}{\text{d}t^2} =\frac{q}{m}[{\bf{E}}+\frac{1}{2c}(\frac{\text{d}{\bf{x}}}{t} \times {\bf{B}}-{\bf{B}} \times \frac{\text{d}{\bf{x}}}{t})]

My expression should be multiplied with the constant -\text{i}/\hbar, so at least the electric field term in my expression is correct. But how do I transform the rest into the wanted expression?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use
m\frac{dv_{i}}{dt} = im[H , v_{i}] + m\frac{\partial v_{i}}{\partial t}

then write
H = \frac{1}{2}m \sum_{k}v_{k}v_{k} + q \phi

Now
<br /> [H , v_{i}] = \frac{m}{2}\sum_{k} \{v_{k}[v_{k}, v_{i}] + [v_{k} , v_{i}] v_{k}\} + \frac{q}{m}[\phi , p_{i}]<br />

Next use the operator equation (try to prove it!)
[v_{i},v_{k}] = i \frac{q}{m^{2}}\epsilon_{ikj}B_{j}
where
B_{j}= (\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{A})_{j}
Notice that
m\frac{\partial v_{i}}{\partial t} = - q \frac{\partial A_{i}}{\partial t}
Put every thing together and you will get the Lorentz force operator. Can you now see your mistakes?

Sam
 
Thank you very much. Very appreciated! However, I didn't get how to find the two vector products without "looking into the future", i.e., knowing what I was looking for.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top