Derivation of the potential of a charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential of a charge, emphasizing the need to set the reference point for potential at infinity rather than zero. The integral for potential is correctly established as moving from distance d to infinity, leading to the formula for potential as φ(d) = kq/d. Clarifications are made regarding the work done by the electric field when moving a positive unit charge towards infinity, with positive potential indicating work is required and negative potential suggesting the charge does work as it moves away. The conversation also highlights the distinction between electric force and external force applied by the user, reinforcing that only the electric force is conservative and has potential. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating and interpreting electric potential in electrostatics.
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


I'm facing an extremely easy problem (well, I set it up myself) that I can't even solve!
I want to calculate the electric potential of a charge q in function of d, the distance from it.

I let 0 be the point where the charge is.
\varphi (d) - \varphi (0) = - \int _0^d \frac{kq \vec r}{r^3} \cdot d \vec r=-k q \int _0^d \frac{dr}{r^2} and I would divide by zero if I continue.
So I realize that instead of the 0 in the lower integral limit, why should I put \infty? After all, it's not like setting the potential energy as 0 at infinity. I'm dealing with the electrostatic potential and not the potential energy (although they differ by a multiplicative constant in the static case).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential at position r is defined as the work done by the field when a positive unit charge moves from r to the point where the potential is zero. In case of a point charge, we choose zero potential at infinity, so you have to integral from d to infinity.

<br /> \varphi (d) - \varphi (\infty)= - \int _d^{\infty} \frac{kq \vec r}{r^3} \cdot d \vec r=-k q \int _d^{\infty} \frac{dr}{r^2}=\frac{kq }{d}<br />

ehild
 
Thanks once again ehild, for the nice clarification/explanation.
 
Last question I hope: if the potential is positive, does that mean I have to do work to "push" the charge from r to infinity? And if the potential is negative, I don't have to do any work, rather the charge will do work and will get farer and farer?
 
I copy my previous sentence :

"The potential at position r is defined as the work done by the field when a positive unit charge moves from r to the point where the potential is zero. In case of a point charge, we choose zero potential at infinity"

If the potential is positive (like in the case around a positive point charge U=kQ/r) the work of the field is positive when the positive unit charge moves toward infinity. Around a negative point charge, the potential is negative (because of the negative value of the charge), so the field does negative work if a positive unit charge moves to infinity, and this work decreases its kinetic energy. The KE never is negative. The positive charge can go away from a negative one if it has some initial KE or there is some other force balancing the electric field.

When you move a charged particle in an electric field, there are two kinds of forces: The electric force and your force. The electric force is well-defined, you can find out that it is conservative, it has potential. Your force is as you like it (with limits, of course) you can not define the electric field by your force.
Moreover: A particle does not do work on itself, it is the force that does the work.

ehild
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top