Derivative and integral of the natural log

phospho
Messages
250
Reaction score
0
not really a problem, but more curious

if we differentiate ln(2x) we get 2/(2x) = 1/x by the chain rule, but if we integrate 1/x we get ln|x|? Could anyone explain why this is the case, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phospho said:
not really a problem, but more curious

if we differentiate ln(2x) we get 2/(2x) = 1/x by the chain rule, but if we integrate 1/x we get ln|x|? Could anyone explain why this is the case, thanks.

ln(2x) = ln(x) + ln(2)

Don't forget the constant of integration.

\displaystyle \int \frac{1}{x}\,dx=\ln(|x|)+C_0=\ln(|x|)+\ln(2)+C_1\,,\ where C0 = C1 + ln(2) .
 
As to the absolute value it is a generalization which works in the case of negative numbers for which the real logarithm ln(x) is undefined. That it applies can be seen by forming the derivative in the separate cases when x > 0 and x < 0 respectively. One should still watch for intervals which include zero for there neither ln(x) nor ln|x| are defined.
 
thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top