Derivative of the cross and dot product

bluelagoon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you have two functions dependent on t, A(t) and B(t). Prove their derivatives are as follows:

d(A (dot) B) / dt = [A (dot) (dB)/(d(t)] + [d(A)/d(t) (dot) B]

{Where "(dot)" acts as the dot product}




d(A x B) / dt = [A x (dB)/(d(t)] + [d(A)/d(t) x B]

{Where "x" acts as the cross product}




I have little experience with differentiating cross products and dot products and appreciate any help in starting this one!

Thanks,
Janet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well A . B = axbx + ayby + azbz (in 3 dimensions)
Differentiate that using the product rule, then regroup and show that its the expression you need it to be equal to. The cross product is similar.
 
I think the easy way around of using \delta_{ij} and \epsilon_{ijk} is a bit too advanced.

For the cross-product I would just say from experience that working backward may be a bit less confusing, e.g. show what two parts are and simplify the output expression, and then showing that it is equal to the derivative of the initial expression
 
You've already proven the derivative rule for one kind of product; doesn't the same method work for these products?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top