Derivative of the metric tensor

[Santiago]

Could anybody help to spot the inconsistency in the following reasoning?

When calculating the normal derivative of the metric tensor I get:

\partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma} = g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + 2 \partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma}, (1)

which means that:

g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} = -\partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma}. (2)

And I don't see how this could be.

That's how I get this result:

<br /> \partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma} = <br /> \partial_\mu (g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} g_{\lambda \gamma}) = <br /> g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + g^{\rho \lambda} g_{\lambda \gamma} \partial_\mu g^{\sigma \gamma} + g_{\lambda \gamma} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g^{\rho \lambda} = <br /> g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + \delta^\rho_\gamma \partial_\mu g^{\sigma \gamma} + \delta^\sigma_\lambda \partial_\mu g^{\rho \lambda} = <br />
<br /> = g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + 2 \partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma}.<br /> (3)

Could anybody show how to get directly the right hand side of equation (2) from the left hand side, or show where the mistake in the equation (3) is?

Thanks a lot.

 

[shoehorn]

Could anybody help to spot the inconsistency in the following reasoning?

When calculating the normal derivative of the metric tensor I get:

\partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma} = g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + 2 \partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma}, (1)

which means that:

g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} = -\partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma}. (2)

And I don't see how this could be.

That's how I get this result:

<br /> \partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma} = <br /> \partial_\mu (g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} g_{\lambda \gamma}) = <br /> g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + g^{\rho \lambda} g_{\lambda \gamma} \partial_\mu g^{\sigma \gamma} + g_{\lambda \gamma} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g^{\rho \lambda} = <br /> g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + \delta^\rho_\gamma \partial_\mu g^{\sigma \gamma} + \delta^\sigma_\lambda \partial_\mu g^{\rho \lambda} = <br />
<br /> = g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} + 2 \partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma}.<br /> (3)

Could anybody show how to get directly the right hand side of equation (2) from the left hand side, or show where the mistake in the equation (3) is?

Thanks a lot.

Unless I've misunderstood something terribly obvious, it's trivial to get what you want. We know that

\partial_cg^{ab} = g^{ad}g^{be}\partial_cg_{de} + 2\partial_cg^{ab}

Agreed? Now subtract 2\partial_cg^{ab} from both sides and you get

g^{ad}g^{be}\partial_cg_{de} = \partial_cg^{ab} - 2\partial_cg^{ab} = -\partial_cg^{ab}

which is what you're looking for.

 

[samalkhaiat]

Could anybody help to spot the inconsistency in the following reasoning?

When calculating the normal derivative of the metric tensor I get:



g^{\rho \lambda} g^{\sigma \gamma} \partial_\mu g_{\lambda \gamma} = -\partial_\mu g^{\rho \sigma}. (2)

And I don't see how this could be.

g^{\mu \rho} g_{\nu \rho} = \delta^{\mu}_{\nu}

\partial \left( g^{\mu \rho} g_{\nu \mu} \right) = 0

thus

g^{\mu \rho} \partial g_{\nu \rho} = - g_{\nu \rho} \partial g^{\mu \rho}

now contract with g^{\nu \sigma}, you get your result.

\delta^{\sigma}_{\rho} \partial g^{\mu \rho} = - g^{\nu \sigma} g^{\mu \rho} \partial g_{\nu \rho}

 

[Santiago]

Thank you shoehorn and samalkhaiat for your replies, it helped a lot. Especially samalkhaiat. That's what I needed.