Can the equation e=mc2 be derived?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chound
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive E=mc2
AI Thread Summary
The equation e=mc² can be derived using principles from physics, and the derivation is commonly found in textbooks. Several users emphasize that understanding the equation requires personal effort and study rather than relying on others to provide the derivation. Links to various discussions and resources are shared for further exploration of the topic. The importance of self-learning in grasping complex concepts like this is highlighted. Engaging with the material directly is encouraged for a deeper understanding.
chound
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Can anyone derive the equation e=mc2 for me. :approve:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look here: http://www.anasoft.co.uk/physics/gr/emc2/emc2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why

I cannot understand your question -- the derivation is available in most physics textbooks all you have to do is read -- if you wish to understand it then tryt it yourself -- But why oh why should anybody else do it for you ?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Back
Top