Deriving a formula that an old physicist showed me.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving a formula for projectile motion in two dimensions, specifically to find the final vertical position (Y1) based on horizontal distance (X1) and other parameters. The formula presented includes components such as acceleration in the vertical direction (Ay), initial velocity (V0), and the angle of projection (Theta). Participants clarify the relationship between vertical and horizontal motion, using trigonometric identities to connect the variables. The key confusion lies in deriving how the vertical component of velocity relates to the horizontal distance and angle. Ultimately, the original poster successfully resolves their confusion with assistance from others in the thread.
amidda1217
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was shown a formula by a physicist I met through a friend when I asked for help with a homework problem. I needed to find y final for a motion in 2 dimensions problem. He showed me this:

Y1 = X1 * tan(Theta) + (Ay * X1^2) /( 2 * V0^2 * cos^2(Theta))

Y1 = Y final
X1 = X Final
Ay = Acceleration of Y
V0 = Initial Velocity

I would love to know where this comes from and how to derive it. The X1tan(theta) makes sense to me: that would just = y of a triangle with base of x1. But the cos^2 and X1 ^2 confuses me. Did those come from an identity?

Have any of you seen this before?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the simple components

uyvsinθ and uxvcosθ (vertical & horizontal)

When the projectile hits the ground y=0

or y = uyt-1/2gt2 (u=initial and g = acceleration or your Ay)

you can solve for t here.


Then you know the entire horizontal range x=uxt, you know ux and t from above, so simplify.

If you're having trouble, post your work.
 
So I was able to derive the second half of the problem from 1/2at^2. The part that I am actually stuck on is the first chunk. I don't understand how ViT derives to XfTan(Theta)

I got T = Xf/VCos(Theta)

But somehow Viy*T = Xf Tan(Theta). Not sure how to derive that.
 
Last edited:
amidda1217 said:
So I was able to derive the second half of the problem from 1/2at^2. The part that I am actually stuck on is the first chunk. I don't understand how ViT derives to XfTan(Theta)

I got T = Xf/VCos(Theta)

But somehow Viy*T = Xf Tan(Theta). Not sure how to derive that.

Now that I think it through, you are relating y with x.

we have y=uyt-½gt2

and we know that x=uxt or x=(vcosθ)t so t = x/vcosθ

and now y = (vsinθ)t-½gt2

sub t into it and you should get it.
 
Thank you very much for your help. I figured it out. Couldn't have done it without help. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top