Deriving an expression for the energy required to separate charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the energy required to separate charges using the work-energy principle. The user starts with the differential work equation and integrates it to find the potential energy between two charges using Coulomb's law. They conclude that the potential energy is given by the expression U(a) = kq1q2/a, confirming that the sign is positive. Additionally, the conversation hints at complexities in further calculations, emphasizing the need for careful mathematical treatment. The derivation appears correct, aligning with established principles in electrostatics.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Hi guys, would just too make sure my derivation and insight to why is correct.
Question: a) only

upload_2017-2-27_18-8-0.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


$$dU=-wd_{ext}$$
$$dU=-F_{ext} \cdot dx$$
Now as the ##F_{ext}## is in the same direction and the direction vector { have not figured how to put direction vector in} then the equation becomes ##dU=-Fdx## this assume the direction is along the x-axis
So now if I intergrate both sides ##\int_{U(a)}^{U\infty}dU=-\int_{a}^{\infty}Fdx##

Subbing in a factoring columbs force law I get:

$$U(\infty)-U(a)=-kq_1q_2[-\frac{1}{x}]_a^\infty$$

Now U infity is zero because there is no force acting on it anymore and so I am left with##-U(a)## on the LHS on the RHS I am left with ##-kq_1q_2\frac{1}{a}##
thus the two negative cancel and I am left with the electric poteinal energy. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your answer has a positive sign, it is correct.Beyond the scope of your homework problem: (c) has a very interesting story. The naive way to improve the estimate leads to something that is not well-defined in mathematics, and you have to be careful how to do it properly to get the correct result.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top