I Deriving Contravariant Form of Levi-Civita Tensor

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the contravariant form of the Levi-Civita tensor from its covariant form, defined as ε_{i,j,k} = √g ε_{i,j,k}. The attempt involves expressing the contravariant tensor ε^{i,j,k} through contractions with the metric tensor and substituting the definition of ε_{i,j,k}. The relationship between the determinant of the dual metric tensor and the Levi-Civita symbol is highlighted, leading to a transformation law for covariant tensor components. The conclusion confirms that the contravariant components yield ε^{jkl} = (1/√g) Δ^{jkl}, establishing the connection between the covariant and contravariant forms in a Riemannian manifold. This exploration reaffirms the nature of the Levi-Civita tensor as a pseudo-tensor due to the sign change under certain transformations.
AndersF
Messages
27
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
If the covariant form for the Levi-Civita is defined as ##\varepsilon_{i,j,k}:=\sqrt{g}\epsilon_{i,j,k}##, how could be shown from this definition that it's contravariant form is given by ##\varepsilon^{i,j,k}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\epsilon^{i,j,k}##?
The covariant form for the Levi-Civita is defined as ##\varepsilon_{i,j,k}:=\sqrt{g}\epsilon_{i,j,k}##. I want to show from this definition that it's contravariant form is given by ##\varepsilon^{i,j,k}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{g}}\epsilon^{i,j,k}##.My attemptWhat I have tried is to express this tensor ##\varepsilon^{i j k}## through the contraction with the metric tensor of ##\varepsilon_{i j k}## the contravariant form, and then to replace the definition of ##\varepsilon_{i j k}##:##\varepsilon^{i j k}=g^{i p} g^{j q} g^{k r} \varepsilon_{p q r}=g^{i p} g^{j q} g^{k r} \sqrt{g} \epsilon_{p q r}##

This expression reminds me of the the expression of the determinant of the dual metric tensor, ##g^{-1}=\det (g^{ij})##, through the Levi-Civita symbol:

##g^{-1}=g^{1 p} g^{2 q} g^{3 r} \epsilon_{p q r}##

But I'm stuck here, as I don't know how to match these expressions... Would there be any way to achieve this? Would this be a good way to prove the theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you talk about a 3D Riemannian manifold here. Then let's define ##\Delta_{jkl}=\Delta^{jkl}## as the totally antisymmetric symbol with ##\Delta_{123}=\Delta^{123}=1##.

Then
$$\epsilon_{jkl}=\sqrt{g} \Delta_{jkl} \quad \text{with} \quad g=\mathrm{det}(g_{\mu \nu})$$
are covariant (pseudo) tensor components.

Indeed, using the transformation law for covariant tensor components you get
$$\epsilon_{abc}'=\sqrt{g} \Delta_{jkl} \frac{\partial q^j}{\partial q^{\prime a}} \frac{\partial q^k}{\partial q^{\prime b}} \frac{\partial q^l}{\partial q^{\prime c}}=\sqrt{g} J \Delta_{abc},$$
where
$$J=\mathrm{det} (\partial_a' q^j)$$
is the Jacobian of the coordinate transformation.

On the other hand
$$g' = \mathrm{det} g_{ab}'=\mathrm{det} (\partial_a' q^j \partial_b' q^k g_{jk})=J^2 g.$$
So if ##J>0##, then indeed
$$\epsilon_{abc}'=\sqrt{g'} \Delta_{abc}.$$
If ##J<0## you get an additional minus sign. That's why ##\epsilon_{jkl}## are the components of a pseudo-tensor rather than a true tensor.

For the contravariant components you get
$$\epsilon^{jkl}=g^{ja} g^{kb} g^{lc} \epsilon_{abc} = \sqrt{g} g^{ja} g^{kb} g^{lc} \Delta_{abc} = \sqrt{g} \mathrm{det}(g^{ab}) \Delta^{jkl}=\frac{1}{g} \sqrt{g} \Delta^{jkl} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{g}} \Delta^{jkl},$$
where I've used that in a Riemannian manifold ##\mathrm{det}(g_{ab})>0##.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
969
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K