Deriving Electric Field from Voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field from voltage for a uniformly charged rod, using the formula V = (Ke*Q/l)*[ln(l+sqr(l^2+a^2))-ln(a)]. To find the y-component of the electric field at point X, the negative partial derivative of voltage with respect to 'a' is needed. Participants confirm that the correct answer for the electric field is Ey = Ke*Q/[a*sqr(l^2+a^2)]. The importance of differentiating with respect to 'a' to simplify the derivation is emphasized. The conversation highlights the interplay between calculus and physics in solving this problem.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
This is probably more Calculus than it is physics. The voltage at a point X produced by a uniformly charged rod is V = (Ke*Q/l)*[ln(l+sqr(l^2+a^2))-ln(a)], in which point X is right above the left end of the rod by a distance a, l is the rod's length, Q is the charge of the rod, and Ke as the constant (sqr( ) refers to square root and ln is natural log).

X(point X a distance a from the left end of the rod, in which a is constant)


__________________ (uniformly charged rod)

I'm supposed to find the y-component of the Electric Field at X, in which I would just find the negative partial derivative of V in respect to y. Would that imply that I derive in respect to a? I've actually tried quite a number of derivations, but they always end up in something lengthy. The answer is Ey = Ke*Q/[a*sqr(l^2+a^2)].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gear300 said:
Would that imply that I derive in respect to a? I've actually tried quite a number of derivations, but they always end up in something lengthy. The answer is Ey = Ke*Q/[a*sqr(l^2+a^2)].

You are correct and so is the final answer. Try it once more. Remember, you have to differentiate wrt 'a' only. (There's a factor (l + sqrt(l^2+a^2) which cancels out.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top