Deriving expressions for Fourier Transforms of Partial Derivatives

N00813
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the formal limit definition of the derivative, derive expressions for the Fourier Transforms with respect to x of the partial derivatives \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} and \frac {\partial u}{\partial x}.

Homework Equations



The Fourier Transform of a function u(x,t) is:
<br /> \tilde{u}(k,t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} u(x,t) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to write the FT of the derivative with respect to time as \lim_{dt \to 0} \frac{u(x,t+dt) - u(x,t)}{dt} and then Fourier Transform it. Pulling the limit outside the integral, I got FT of (\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}) = \tilde{\frac {\partial u}{\partial t}}(k,t).Now, with the partial derivative of x, I'm not so sure. The partial derivative wrt x is \lim_{dx \to 0} \frac{u(x + dx,t) - u(x,t)}{dx}. When placed in the Fourier transform, I don't know what I can do. I don't think the dx at the end of the integral cancels out the dx in the definition of the derivative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
N00813 said:

Homework Statement



Using the formal limit definition of the derivative, derive expressions for the Fourier Transforms with respect to x of the partial derivatives \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} and \frac {\partial u}{\partial x}.



Homework Equations



The Fourier Transform of a function u(x,t) is:
<br /> \tilde{u}(k,t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} u(x,t) e^{-ikx} dx<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted to write the FT of the derivative with respect to time as \lim_{dt \to 0} \frac{u(x,t+dt) - u(x,t)}{dt} and then Fourier Transform it. Pulling the limit outside the integral, I got FT of (\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}) = \tilde{\frac {\partial u}{\partial t}}(k,t).


Now, with the partial derivative of x, I'm not so sure. The partial derivative wrt x is \lim_{dx \to 0} \frac{u(x + dx,t) - u(x,t)}{dx}. When placed in the Fourier transform, I don't know what I can do. I don't think the dx at the end of the integral cancels out the dx in the definition of the derivative.

You should avoid using "dx" and so forth as anything other than part of a derivative or integral (or as a differential form). Otherwise you run into this sort of confusion. When taking limits, use either \delta x or another letter.

You want to calculate
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{u(x+h, t) - u(x,t)}h e^{-ikx}\,dx<br /> = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac1h \left( \int_{-\infty}^\infty u(x + h, t)e^{-ikx}\,dx - \int_{-\infty}^\infty u(x, t)e^{-ikx}\,dx \right)<br />
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
pasmith said:
You should avoid using "dx" and so forth as anything other than part of a derivative or integral (or as a differential form). Otherwise you run into this sort of confusion. When taking limits, use either \delta x or another letter.

You want to calculate
<br /> \int_{-\infty}^\infty \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{u(x+h, t) - u(x,t)}h e^{-ikx}\,dx<br /> = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac1h \left( \int_{-\infty}^\infty u(x + h, t)e^{-ikx}\,dx - \int_{-\infty}^\infty u(x, t)e^{-ikx}\,dx \right)<br />

Thanks, I must have derped out last night.

I'm thinking about turning the 2nd term into \lim_{h \to \infty} \frac{1}{h} \tilde{u}(k,t) and substituting the y = x + h into the first term, to give a final result of:
<br /> \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{1}{h} ((e^{ik(0+h)}-e^{ik0}) \tilde{u}) = ike^{0} \tilde{u}<br />
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top