Deriving Formula for Rotational & SHM - Any Help Appreciated

  • Thread starter Thread starter trojsi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the formula f=1/2π (k/(M+I/R^2)) for a system involving rotational motion and simple harmonic motion (SHM). Participants emphasize the need to visualize the motion of the mass and the spring, suggesting the use of an x-axis to measure the block's position relative to its equilibrium. Key points include distinguishing between the angular speed of the wheel and the angular frequency of SHM, as they represent different concepts. One participant notes the importance of applying Newton's second law to the wheel and suggests setting up a differential equation to clarify the relationship between variables. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of integrating rotational and linear dynamics in this context.
trojsi
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am asked to derive a formula from the diagram attached. I should end up with this equation:

f=1/2\pi (k/(M+I/R^2))


I tried really hard relating linear quantities with rotational (T=Fr, T=I*alpha etc.) ones but it was all in vain.

Any help would be really appreciated.

thanks
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    11.9 KB · Views: 361
Physics news on Phys.org
can you show us what you have tried so far?
 
also, i think everything except the 1/2pi should be under a square root.
 
You were right on the square root, I will correct it. Please find attached what I have tried so far. There are about 2 full A3, but I wrote down what I thought makes sense.

thanks any help
 

Attachments

  • PTDC0074low.jpg
    PTDC0074low.jpg
    29.5 KB · Views: 361
ok, i see a couple of problems with your approach. first, i am not sure where you get the formula \alpha=\omega^2 R. This is not true for SHM.

This leads to the second problem. you are attacking the problem as if were a statics problem, or as a constant acceleration problem. we need to start imagining this thing in motion. the mass is moving up and down and the spring is stretching and compressing. I would draw an x-axis beside the block and use that to measure where the block is at a giving time. let x=0 be the equilibrium position, this will be the most convenient. thus the motion is restricted to \pm A where A is the amplitude of the motion. this will help with visualization.

now, one major point of confusion is that we are going to have two \omega's which mean totally different things. first we have the angular speed of the wheel at any given time, call this \omega_w, and since the wheel will be changing speed all the time, this will be a function of time, so \omega_w=\omega_w(t).

the other will be the angular frequency of the SHM of the mass, let's just call that one \omega. this is the one that will be constant and is the answer to the problem, well \omega=2 \pi f and f is the answer.

so just to reiterate, \omega_w is the angular speed of the wheel, so \alpha_w=\frac{d \omega_w}{dt}=\frac{a}{R} where R is the radius of the wheel, and a is the linear acceleration of the mass. these are the quantities you want to use when applying Newton's second law to the wheel.

hopefully this will get you started in the right direction. this is a tricky problem, and i had to set up a differential equation (but not solve it) in order for \omega to make itself known.

good luck
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top