Deriving 'G' from E=mc^2 and Gravitons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the constant 'G', which represents the gravitational constant in physics, and its relationship to the concept of gravitons, hypothetical particles that mediate gravitational forces. The mathematical expressions provided illustrate how 'G' relates to force, mass, and acceleration, emphasizing the stability of the speed of light (c) in gravitational interactions. The argument suggests that 'G' serves as a mathematical tool to maintain consistency in gravitational equations, similar to how the speed of light is treated in other physics equations. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of these constants in understanding fundamental forces. Overall, the discussion highlights the intricate connections between gravitational forces, mass, and the constants that govern them.
xeno
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What does the unit and magnitude of constant 'G' mean, and what is its relation with graviton? ANY OPINION?


Here is how i see it:

E=mc^2
c^2=E/m where E=W=Fr (r stands for radius or distance or ‘s’)
therefore c^2= Fr/m
therefore c^2= c^2----when forces interact the forces hold true the constant c^2 in order to remain stable

therefore Fr/m= Fr/m

Fr/m=mar/m ----where F=ma
Fr/mm=ar/m ----where a=F/m

therefore Fr/mm=Fr/mm

Fr/mm=Fvt/mm ----v=r/t where r=vt
Fr/mm=Frt/tmm ----where v=r/t

therefore Frt/mm=Frt/mm

Frt/mm=Frr/vmm ----where t=r/v
Frtv/mm=Frr/mm ----where v=r/t

therefore Frr/mm=Frr/mm

where F=(Frr/mm)mm/r^2 ----(Frr/mm) is proportionality for example: F=Kq1q2/r^2-electromagnetic force

The "G" (=Frr/mm) is a way of expressing how the constant c is kept true mathematically when forces interact just the way c^2 is a mathematical expression expressing that c should always remain true in order for the matter to remain stable
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That don't make any difference.
 
QuantumNet
what doesen't make any difference?
thanks
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top