Deriving Gauss's Law Without Coulomb's Law

Rudipoo
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hi, can you derive Gauss's Law without using Coulomb's Law? If so, how?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rudipoo said:
Hi, can you derive Gauss's Law without using Coulomb's Law? If so, how?

Thanks

That depends on what you mean by Gauss Law: There is the Gauss law in matematics, also known as the Divergence Theorem, and then there's is Gauss law in electrodymanics, which is a special case of the Divergence theorem applied to the vectorfunction \mathbf{\vec F}=kr^{-2}\mathbf{\hat r} (which essentally is Coulomb's Law)

The former can be derived mathematically, but that you should be able to find in virtually any undergraduate math textbook.
 
You can derive Gauss's law from Coulomb's law and vice versa. In other words, they are simply different ways of stating the same thing. However, I don't think that you can "derive" either without the other. They were determined experimentally and not from more fundamental considerations.
 
Well Gauss law it si just Laplace-Poisson eqn revisited in another sauce. It is obvious that coulomb <-> gauss. just because on the mathematical nature of the electrostatic potential.
Well the first principal is that we are trying to solve laplace eqn assuming isotrpy of the universe. so you finf that in a 3-dimensional world, the correct potential is V=-k/r.
Try everybody to solve (with distribution theory it is easier) D(f)=delta. Where D is the laplacian and delta is Dirac one. Physically its like to imagine a point charge/mass genarating the field...

you can figure out also the dipendence of the potential versus the space dimension, for example if i remeber righ, if we were leaving in flat land the electric potential would have been v=Cost*log(r)... somethinh like that.

I think you may apply the same result to the gravitation potantial sinc the mathematical nature is the same... y
 
Rudipoo said:
Hi, can you derive Gauss's Law without using Coulomb's Law? If so, how?
Thanks
Maxwell's equation\nabla\cdot\{\vec D}=4\pi\rho can be taken as a starting point for electrostatics, rather than Coulomb's law. Then Gauss's law follows from putting this into the divergence theorem.
 
Thanks very much.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top