Deriving mean free path of ideal gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the mean free path of an ideal gas, with confusion arising over the interpretation of the model used in the derivation. Participants clarify that the "cylinder" mentioned is not a physical object but a representation of the volume swept by a molecule's effective collision area over time. The conversation emphasizes that the mean free path refers to the average distance a molecule travels before colliding, rather than considering additional volumes like hemispheres at the ends. The importance of using particle number density in conjunction with the volume swept by the molecule is highlighted. Overall, the thread seeks to clarify misconceptions about the geometric representation in the context of gas collisions.
hasan_researc
Messages
166
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The mean free path for an ideal collisional gas can be calculated as shown on thishttp://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Kinetic/menfre.html" . I understand the derivation, except for one thing.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The molecule is at one end of the cylinder at the beginning, and any of the particles could have collided with the molecule at that instant. The same consideration has to go when the molecule reaahes the other end of the cylinder. Does that not mean that we should attach hemispherical volumes to the ends of the cylinder, and take into account any collisions at the end.

Please help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your problem comes from misunderstanding the diagram. Unless I'm reading it wrong, that's not a cylinder, it's simply the volume which the molecules effective collision area sweeps out in a time t (moving at speed v).

Of course it could collide with something at the start, it might not collide with anything for 10 minutes ! (Although that chance is about as much as England winning the world cup right now). But you're talking about the mean free path, which is the average distance it travels before colliding once.

If you have any more questions feel free to ask.
 
So, you're saying it's not a cylinder, then! Is it a hollow cylinder in that case?

Secondly, in finding the number of particles that collide with the molecule, we have to use the

1. particle number density

2. the volume which is the sum of the volume traversed by the molecule and the envelope that surrounds it.

In that case, we do need to include the hemispherical volms at th end, right??
 
I think you misunderstand me

hasan_researc said:
2. the volume which is the sum of the volume traversed by the molecule and the envelope that surrounds it.

That IS the "cylinder" in the picture, it's not a real cylinder, but it's just a picture of the volume which the particles effective collision area moves through in a time t.

I'm not sure what you mean about the hemisphere's on the end. We're assuming a 2D collision area here, not a volume of collision or something like that.
 
Well, I understand that it's not a real cylinder. If it were, the molecule could not have moved at all. What I mean is an imaginary cylinder that encloses the region over the collisions take place.

If we were really assuming a 2d collision area, then the formula for the number of particles in that region would have a different form. But the formula is the volume of cylinder*number density, right??
 
hasan_researc said:
If we were really assuming a 2d collision area, then the formula for the number of particles in that region would have a different form. But the formula is the volume of cylinder*number density, right??

Why would it have a different form? We're assuming a 2D collision area which sweeps out a volume equal to the area* the velocity every second. Therefore we need to consider the number of particles in the given volume.

hasan_researc said:
Well, I understand that it's not a real cylinder. If it were, the molecule could not have moved at all. What I mean is an imaginary cylinder that encloses the region over the collisions take place.

Again, I'm not sure what you mean by this at all, but i repeat that the "cylinder" merely represents the volume which the molecules collision area moves through in a time t (going at a speed v).

I'm also still not sure what you mean by hemispheres.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top