Deriving Molar Specific Heat Equation

AI Thread Summary
To derive the molar specific heat at constant volume for a mixture of n_1 moles of a monatomic gas and n_2 moles of a diatomic gas, the relevant equations for internal energy and specific heat are discussed. The first law of thermodynamics indicates that for an isochoric process, the work done is zero, simplifying the equation to Q = n(C_v)(change in T). The specific heats for the gases are C_v = (3/2)R for the monatomic gas and C_v = (5/2)R for the diatomic gas. The total internal energy is expressed as a function of the moles and final temperature, leading to confusion regarding the correct use of variables, particularly the transition from k to R. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in variable usage and the derivation process for the specific heat of the mixture.
Funktimus
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


n_1 moles of a monatomic gas and n_2 moles of a diatomic gas are mixed together in a container.

Derive an expression for the molar specific heat at constant volume of the mixture.
My answer can only use the variables n_1 and n_2, and I'm assuming constants.

Homework Equations


Monoatomic gas
E_th = (3/2)nRT
C_v = (3/2)R

Diatomic gas
E_th = (5/2)nRT
C_v = (5/2)R

First Law:
(Change)E_th = W + Q = (n)(C_v)(change in T)

The Attempt at a Solution


Honestly, I'm not sure where to begin.

I'm assuming:
Since volume is constant, that means this is an Isochoric process.
In which case W = 0
Which means (change in E_th) = 0 + Q = n(C_v)(change in T)

So...
for the monoatomic gas
E_1f = (n_1)(C_v)(T) = (3/2)(n_1)(R)(T_1f)

for the diatomic gas
E_2f = (n_2)(C_v)(T) = (5/2)(n_2)(R)(T_2f)

Now I figure this is a process going for thermal equilibrium...
so
T_1f = T_2f = T_f, so I can make the temperature variable T_f from now on.
E_1f = (n_1)/(n_1 + n_2)
E_2f = (n_2)/(n_1 + n_2)
E_tot = E_1f + E_2f
E_tot = (3/2)(n_1)(R)(T_f) + (5/2)(n_2)(R)(T_f)

I don't know where I'm going with this. Can someone tell me if I'm going in the right direction?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's wrong with the following?
U=n1 3/2 kT + n2 5/2 kT

C=dU/dT=n1 3/2 k +n2 5/2 k
 
I dunno, apparently it's wrong. Cause that's what I initially plugged in. It told me k is not a variable, and I should use R, which is lame that it didn't say that in the first place. I converted k to R using avogaddies number and its still says its wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top