Deriving Speed and Period of Rotating Disk System with Attached Small Disk

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
AI Thread Summary
A small disk is attached to a larger disk, and the system is analyzed as it rotates around a frictionless axle. The speed of the small disk at the equilibrium position is derived as v=2{Rg(1-cos theetre)/[ M/m+ (r/R)^2+2]}^0.5, while the period is T=2pi {[(M+2m)R^2+mr^2]/[2mgR]}^0.5. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the parallel axis theorem to correctly calculate the moment of inertia for both disks. It is clarified that integration is unnecessary due to the small angle approximation, leading to a harmonic motion solution. The conversation highlights common misunderstandings in applying torque and inertia concepts in rotational dynamics.
Wen
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
A small thin disk of radius r and mass m is attached rigidly to the face of a second thin disk of radius R and mass M. The centre of the small disk is located at the edge of the large disk. The large disk is mounted on its centre of a frictionless axle. the assembly is rotated through a small angle theetre from its equilibrium position and then released. Show that the speed of the small disk as it passes through the equilibrium position is

v=2{Rg(1-cos theetre)/[ M/m+ (r/R)^2+2]}^0.5

and the period is

T=2pi {[(M+2m)R^2+mr^2]/[2mgR]}^0.5

I am stuck in the first part already.
My method was: Since the axis of rotation is through the COM of the larger disk, hence the nett torque is mgRsin theetre.
This torque is equal to I alpha which is equal to (1/2MR^2+mR^2) alpha.
angular aceleration is not constant so i must carry out an integration when using the eqn V^2=U^2+2aS

i have been struggling with this prob. for a long time . pl help me.
 

Attachments

  • P1010211.JPG
    P1010211.JPG
    16.2 KB · Views: 856
Physics news on Phys.org
Wen said:
A small thin disk of radius r and mass m is attached rigidly to the face of a second thin disk of radius R and mass M. The centre of the small disk is located at the edge of the large disk. The large disk is mounted on its centre of a frictionless axle. the assembly is rotated through a small angle theetre from its equilibrium position and then released. Show that the speed of the small disk as it passes through the equilibrium position is

v=2{Rg(1-cos theetre)/[ M/m+ (r/R)^2+2]}^0.5

and the period is

T=2pi {[(M+2m)R^2+mr^2]/[2mgR]}^0.5

I am stuck in the first part already.
My method was: Since the axis of rotation is through the COM of the larger disk, hence the nett torque is mgRsin theetre.
This torque is equal to I alpha which is equal to (1/2MR^2+mR^2) alpha.
angular aceleration is not constant so i must carry out an integration when using the eqn V^2=U^2+2aS

i have been struggling with this prob. for a long time . pl help me.
You don't have to do an integration. You can regognize the differential equation \theta = k\ddot{\theta} as the harmonic equation. It has a general solution of \theta (t)= A\cos{\sqrt{k}t} + B\sin{\sqrt{k}t} for constants A and B to be determined by initial conditions. Remember that it was specified that the angle was small, so the approximation \sin{\theta} \approx \theta is valid. Also, you don't have the moment of inertia correct. I is equal to the moment of inertia of the big disk plus that of the small disk. The moment of inertia of the large one is simply \frac{MR^2}{2}, while the second can be computed with the use of the parallel axis theorem. I am getting a slightly different answer than the one you gave. I get the 2 in v=2{...}^.5 to be inside the square root. One of us made a mistake, so just check and make sure it isn't you.
 
no it was correct.2 is outside of the sq. rt.
But the angular a is not constant, so i thought a integration must be carried out?

I was using the parallel axis theorem: 1/2MR^2 + mR^2
 
Wen said:
I was using the parallel axis theorem: 1/2MR^2 + mR^2
Where did you use the parallel axis theorem? Here you are treating the small disk as a point mass, which it is not. Use the parallel axis theorem to find the rotational inertia of the small disk about the axis of the large disk. (You neglected the rotational inertia of the small disk about its own center.)
 
No, there is no need for integration. Once you use the approximation \sin{\theta} \approx \theta, then it simply becomes the harmonic equation, for which the solution is known. The parallel axis theorem says that the moment of inertia of the small disk is \frac{mr^2}{2} + mR^2. Combine that with the moment of inertial of the larger disk to get \frac{mr^2}{2} + mR^2 +\frac{MR^2}{2} = (\frac{M}{2} + m)R^2 + \frac{mr^2}{2}.
 
The Restoring torque is given by

tau = - mgR@

hence torque constant K is mgR
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top