Deriving Standard Form of Ellipse Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mahmoud2010
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the standard form of the ellipse equation and addresses concerns about squaring both sides of an equation. It clarifies that the steps taken in the derivation are reversible, with the only potential issue arising from taking square roots. However, since only the positive square root is considered, the derivation remains valid. The participants confirm that if two positive numbers squared are equal, the numbers themselves must also be equal. Overall, the derivation process is deemed sound and reliable.
Mahmoud2010
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
in the derivation of the standard form of equation of ellipse

[PLAIN]http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8324/capturedpw.jpg

we squared both sides of equation isn't that means that we have produce we have produced a candidate which doesn't satisfy the original equation.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no problem because all of your steps are reversible. When you work the steps in reverse order, the only place where there is a potential problem is where you take square roots. But if you look carefully, you will see that you are only taking the positive square root of both sides, which themselves are positive numbers. And if you have two positive numbers a and b with a2=b2, then a = b. You don't have the possibility that a = ±b.
 
I think of this also . but I want to be more certain.

At all Thanks for help.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top