How can I eliminate phi and u to derive the Compton effect equation?

b2386
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Right now, I am working on a homework problem asking me to derive the Compton effect, which is given by \lambda\prime-\lambda=\frac{h}{m_ec}(1-cos\theta)

A diagram of the situation can be found here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/compton.html#c1 (However, in my diagram, the recoil electron and scattered photon are switched with the electron and \phi below the x-axis and the photon and \theta above the x axis.)

To derive the equation, I use the momentum conservation equations and energy conservation equation.

There are two equations for the momentum, one for the x component and one for the y component:

x-component: \frac{h}{\lambda}=\frac{h}{\lambda\prime}cos\theta+\gamma m u cos\phi

y-component: 0=\frac{h}{\lambda\prime}sin\theta-\gamma mu sin\phi

where \gamma=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}
m=electron mass
u=electron velocity after the collision

My equation for energy conservation is:

h\frac{c}{\lambda}+mc^2=h\frac{c}{\lambda\prime}+\gamma m c^2


To start off, I solved the x component of the momentum for cos(phi) and the y component for sin(phi). I then added the equations together and got (since sin^2 + cos^2 = 1):

\frac{h^2}{\lambda\prime^2\gamma^2m^2u^2}+\frac{h^2}{\lambda^2\gamma^2m^2u^2}-\frac{2h^2cos\theta}{\lambda\prime\lambda\gamma^2m^2u^2}=1

At this point, I am to now eliminate u using the resulting equation and the equation for the energy conservation as given above. However, I am stuck on this next step because it seems as though any algabraic manipulation I try makes the equation extremely complicated. Could anyone please give me some hints as to what step should be next?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The easy way to do it is (in natural units):
1. Conservation of 4-momentum is k-k'=p'-p, where p=(m;0).
2. Square each 4-vector, getting 2kk'(1-cos)=2mE'-2m^2.
3. Conservation of energy is E'-m=k-k', so kk'(1-cos)=m(k-k').
4. Divide by kk' and use lambda=2pi/k. Put in hbar/c if you want.
 
Thanks for your replies. However, in the problem wording, it specifically tells us to start by eliminating "phi" first and then eliminate "u" from the 3equations. I have a hunch that this will be accomplished by substituting

in \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}} for \gamma. This eliminates gamma and also results in more "u"s, which may allow me to cancel them out. It's just getting to that point that is the problem.
 
b2386 said:
Thanks for your replies. However, in the problem wording, it specifically tells us to start by eliminating "phi" first and then eliminate "u" from the 3equations. I have a hunch that this will be accomplished by substituting

in \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}} for \gamma. This eliminates gamma and also results in more "u"s, which may allow me to cancel them out. It's just getting to that point that is the problem.
The link I posted outlines the approach that will get you there. The key is to express the electron energy in terms of its momentum and rest energy instead of the representation you used. Solve your last equation and the energy equation for momentum squared and set them equal. With a bit of Algebra many terms will cancel and you will have the result.
 
Last edited:
b2386 said:
Thanks for your replies. However, in the problem wording, it specifically tells us to start by eliminating "phi" first and then eliminate "u" from the 3equations.
Who would tell you to do it that way?
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top