B Deriving the Polar of a Point on a Conic

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Appleton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polar Pole
Appleton
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
If a general conic is

<br /> ax^2+2hxy+by^2+2gx+2fy+c=0<br />

I am told that, if P(p, q) is a point on this conic, then the polar of P(p, q) to this conic is

<br /> apx+h(py+qx)+bgy+g(p+x)+f(q+y)+c=0<br />

How is this derived?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is your definition of the polar of a point wrt the conic? What do you know about the polar if the point lies on the conic?
 
Thanks for your reply micromass. I realize I made a mistake. P(p,q) does not lie on the conic.

The polar is the chord of contact of the tangents from P.

If the point lies on the conic then the chord of contact would be non existent as P and the tangent points would all be coincident.

If we assume there are no constraints on P, what would be the derivation?
 
Do you know the equation of the tangent line from ##P##?
 
OK I think I'm with you now. Thanks for the prompt. I think the implicit derivative was my main stumbling block, amongst various other oversights.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top