Deriving the Shortest Path in Radial Co-ordinates Using Variational Principle

No Name Required
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I have this question,

Express the length of a given curve r = r(\theta) in radial co-ordinates. Using the Variational principle derive the shortest path between two points is a line.

Ive drawn a picture with two angles (measured from the x-axis) \theta_1 and \theta_2 so that r(\theta_1) = r_1 and r(\theta_2) = r_2.

I found the legth of the infinitesimal dl to be

dl = \sqrt{r'^2 + r^2} \; d\theta so that

\displaystyle{L = \int^{\theta_2}_{\theta_1} \sqrt{r'^2 + r^2} \; d\theta}

So my functional is f = \sqrt{r'^2 + r^2}

I have calculated \displaystyle{\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} = \frac{r}{\sqrt{r^2 + r'^2}}} and \displaystyle{\frac{\partiall f}{\partial r'} = \frac{r'}{\sqrt{r^2 + r'^2}}}

Also \displaystyle{\frac{\partial f}{\partial \theta} = 0}

I have tried setting up

\displaystyle{\frac{d}{d\theta} \frac{\partial f}{\partial r'} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} = 0} but this is leading to a nasty nonlinear second order differential equation which i presume is not correct.

I know that \theta is cyclic so a conservation law exists but I am not sure how to go about using this.

If someone could give me a plan of how to do the next couple of steps it would be great.

Thankyou
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the equation you should obtain from varying the path length is
<br /> \frac{d}{d\theta}\left(\frac{r&#039;}{f}\right) = \frac{r}{f},<br />
where f(r,r&#039;) = \sqrt{r^2 + r&#039;^2}. First, let me note that a circle (r constant) does not satisfy this equation. You should expect this since the arc of a circle is not the shortest distance between two points. Second, you should probably write out the equation for a line in polar coordinates. It is kind of messy in general, but you could pick a representative type of line and show that it solves the equation. Once you know this, you can always rotate your coordinates to show that all other lines satisfy the differential equation too.

I worked it out myself so it can be definitely be done. Let me know if you have any more trouble.
 
Last edited:
In cartesian coordinates you have:
\int{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}dx}
\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} - \frac{d}{dx}\displaystyle{(}\frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{y}}\displaystyle{)} = 0
... thus:
f = \sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}
\frac{\partial f}{\partial y} = 0; \frac{\partial f}{\partial \dot{y}} = \frac{\dot{y}}{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}}
\frac{d}{dx}\displaystyle{[}\frac{\dot{y}}{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}}\displaystyle{]} = 0
\frac{\ddot{y}}{\sqrt{1 + \dot{y}^2}^3} = 0
... thus:
\ddot{y} = 0
... and:
y = ax + b
 
Last edited:
Thankyou very much for your time and thoughts. I have solved the problem in polar co ordinates and if anyone is particularly interested i will write it up for them. I will check back tomorrow.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top