Deriving Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric from LEFEs

In summary: For static, spherically symmetrical case, the Energy- momentum tensor:Tμν = diag { ρc2 , 0, 0, 0 }The metric perturbations for static ortho-normal coordinates:hμν = diag { htt , hxx , hyy , hzz }With one index rised using flat space-time Minquoskwi metric ημν= { -1 , 1, 1, 1 }:hμν = diag { -htt , hxx , hyy , hzz }The trace of the metric:h = hγγ = - htt + hxx + hy
  • #1
Nikhil Hadap
1
1
I am trying to derive weak-field Schwarzschild metric using Linearized Einstein's field equations of gravity:

[]hμν – 1/2 ημν []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Tμν

For static, spherically symmetrical case, the Energy- momentum tensor:

Tμν = diag { ρc2 , 0, 0, 0 }

Corresponding metric perturbations for static ortho-normal coordinates:

hμν = diag { htt , hxx , hyy , hzz }

With one index rised using flat space-time Minquoskwi metric ημν= { -1 , 1, 1, 1 }:

hμν = diag { -htt , hxx , hyy , hzz }

Trace of the metric:

h = hγγ = - htt + hxx + hyy + hzz

The four equations:

1) []htt – 1/2 ηtt []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Ttt

=> []htt + 1/2 []( - htt + hxx + hyy + hzz )= -16πGρ/ c2

=> 1/2 []( htt + hxx + hyy + hzz )= -16πGρ/ c2

2) []hxx – 1/2 ηxx []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Txx

=> []hxx - 1/2 []( - htt + hxx + hyy + hzz )= 0

=> 1/2 []( htt + hxx - hyy - hzz )= 0

Similarly:

3) 1/2 []( htt - hxx + hyy - hzz )= 0

4) 1/2 []( htt - hxx - hyy + hzz )= 0

Adding equations 2), 3) & 4) to 1) respectively, yield:

[]( htt + hxx ) = []( htt + hyy ) = []( htt + hzz )= -16πGρ/ c2

Solving the equations using:

[] ≈ ▼2 ≈ 1/R2 d/ dR ( R2 d/ dR ) for static spherically symmetric case; we get:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= -8πGρR2 / 3c2 – K1/ R + K2

Similar solutions for vacuum case, with Tμν= 0 would be:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= – K1'/ R + K2'

For the metric to be asymptotically flat:

K2 = K2' = 0

For the solutions to be continuous at boundary, R= r, the radius of spherically symmetric matter:

- 8πGρr2 / 3c2 ≈ - 2Gm/ rc2

The remaining two constants must be:

K1 = 0 & K1' = 2Gm/ Rc2

Therefore, the complete solution becomes:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= - 2Gm/ Rc2

But, as per the literature, the weak field Schwarzschild metric must be:

( htt + hxx ) = ( htt + hyy ) = ( htt + hzz )= + 4Gm/ Rc2

I am not able to make out where I am making mistake. Can anybody please help?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It really helps you more to learn about LaTex scientific writing software than how to derive a solution to a differential equation...
 
  • #3
Nikhil Hadap said:
Linearized Einstein's field equations of gravity:

[]hμν – 1/2 ημν []hγγ = -16πG/ c4 Tμν

To compare with the literature, I think you need a + sign on the RHS.
 

1. What is the significance of deriving the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric from LEFEs?

The Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric is a solution to Einstein's field equations that describes the gravitational field around a non-rotating, spherically symmetric mass. Deriving it from the Linearized Einstein Field Equations (LEFEs) allows us to understand how gravity behaves in weak gravitational fields, such as those found in our solar system. This is important for many applications, such as spacecraft navigation and orbit calculations.

2. How is the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric derived from LEFEs?

The Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric is derived by approximating the full Einstein field equations with the LEFEs, which are linearized versions of the equations. This simplifies the equations and makes them easier to solve. The resulting solution is the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric, which describes the gravitational field around a non-rotating, spherically symmetric mass in weak gravitational fields.

3. What is the difference between the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric and the full Schwarzschild Metric?

The Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric is an approximation of the full Schwarzschild Metric. It is only valid in weak gravitational fields, while the full Schwarzschild Metric is valid in all gravitational fields. Additionally, the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric is a linearized solution, while the full Schwarzschild Metric is a non-linear solution.

4. Can the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric be used to describe strong gravitational fields?

No, the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric is only valid in weak gravitational fields. It cannot accurately describe strong gravitational fields, such as those near black holes or neutron stars. In these cases, the full Schwarzschild Metric or other more advanced solutions to the field equations must be used.

5. How does the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric compare to Newton's theory of gravity?

The Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric and Newton's theory of gravity are both theories that describe the behavior of gravity in weak gravitational fields. However, the Weak-Field Schwarzschild Metric is a more accurate and precise theory, as it takes into account the effects of space and time on gravity. Newton's theory is a simpler approximation that works well in most cases, but it breaks down in extreme situations such as near black holes.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
982
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
202
Back
Top