Describe forces on a test charge in electromagnetism

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the concept of forces acting on a test charge in electromagnetism. Participants seek clarification on how a test charge interacts with other charges, specifically positive and negative ones. The term "felt" is questioned, with users expressing uncertainty about its meaning in this context. There is a request for a clearer explanation of the forces experienced by a test charge when near other charges. Overall, the conversation highlights a need for a more straightforward understanding of electrostatic forces.
Blink691
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm completely clueless with these statements. I watched a video on this, but all it said is that it was "complex" which didn't explain it much. If someone would possibly help me that would be great.. and appreciated! Thank you.

A. Describe the force "felt" by the test charge as it is brought near another positive charge.

B. Describe the force "felt" by the test charge as it is brought near a negative charge.

C. Describe the force "felt" by the test charge as it is brought near a combination of other charges
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Blink691 said:
I'm completely clueless with these statements. I watched a video on this, but all it said is that it was "complex" which didn't explain it much. If someone would possibly help me that would be great.. and appreciated! Thank you.
A. Describe the force "felt" by the test charge as it is brought near another positive charge.
B. Describe the force "felt" by the test charge as it is brought near a negative charge.
C. Describe the force "felt" by the test charge as it is brought near a combination of other charges
I am not sure how to help you. Do you not understand the use of "felt" here?

Tell us what you know of how forces between objects with different charges act.
 
I understand just about everything relating to forces, but I'm not exactly sure what they mean by "felt"... the video just said it was a feeling of comlex which didn't make much sense to me. Thank you though for replying.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top