Designing a Damper: Needing Guidance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a damper with specific parameters, including energy absorption of 4500J, a stroke of 15mm, and a maximum load of 400kN on the fixings. The user has calculated the beam's frequency at 2.289 rad/s but is uncertain about the initial velocity and how to calculate the system's frequency for effective impact absorption. Key points of confusion include the role of gravity, the presence of a spring, and the configuration of the damper's attachment points. Clarifications indicate that gravity acts downward, and a spring is involved in the design, with the left end of the damper fixed to the frame. The discussion emphasizes the need for accurate measurements and assumptions to finalize the damper's design.
mholland
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm a bit stuck on a problem I'm trying to figure out.
I am trying to design a damper, the layout is show below:
damperlayout.jpg

(apologies for the poor 'cad' drawing!)
So far i know:
I for the beam, how much energy needs to be absorbed by the damper (4500j) and the stroke (15mm). The maximum loading allowed on the fixings is 400kN
From these I've figure out that that ω of the beam is 2.289rad/s. I do not know the initial velocity.
I'm just after some pointers to calculate damper requirements/ζ
I'm a bit confused as to how to calculate the frequency of the system as it is to absorb a single impact effectively, and have a hard stop
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does gravity act in this problem? Which way? Is there any spring? What is the black arrow? How high is the red post at the left end where the damper is connected? Is the 0.3 m leg fixed? Is the disk a fixed pivot?

It would help if you would show how you have figured out the beam frequency and what your assumptions were.
 
Thanks for taking the time to reply, for the red bar, say 20cm (i'm still waiting on cad drawings for accurate measurements), and yes the .3m post is fixed
Yer gravity acts downwards and there is a spring, which is the main slider tube shown below, forcing the bar to rotate as it extends.
The only data I've been given to work off is what i gave in the first post
 

Attachments

  • mlg.jpg
    mlg.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 587
It looks to me like the left end of the damper goes to a fixed point on the frame, not related in any particular way to the moving red lever. Do you agree, or not?
 
The short .3m vertical red strut is stationary, and the long 1.3m (and the red triangular attachment) are rotating clockwise, with the ends of the damper attached where shown
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top