Designing a Space Station: Calculate Rotational Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around designing a space station that simulates Earth-like gravity through rotational motion and gravitational attraction from neutron star matter. Key calculations involve determining the necessary rate of rotation for the outer rim, which is 200 meters from the center, to achieve the desired gravitational effect. Participants express confusion about the relevance of the inner control room and the lack of information regarding the mass of the neutron star matter. The conversation highlights the need for centripetal acceleration calculations and the relationship between angular velocity and gravitational force. Overall, the problem is perceived as incomplete, raising questions about the missing data necessary for accurate calculations.
PascalPanther
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
"While listening to your professor drone on, you dream about becoming an engineer helping to design a new space station to be built in deep space far from any planetary systems. This state-of-the-(future) art station is powered by a small amount of neutron star matter which has a density of 2 x 10^14 g/cm^3. The station will be a large light-weight wheel rotating about its center which contains the power generator. A control room is a tube which goes all the way around the wheel and is 10 meters from its center. The living space and laboratories are located at the outside rim of the wheel and are another tube which goes all the way around it at a distance of 200 meters from the center. To keep the environment as normal as possible, people in the outer rim should experience the same “weight” as they had on Earth. That is if they were standing on a bathroom scale, it would read the same as if they were on Earth. This is accomplished by a combination of the rotation of the station and the gravitational attraction of the neutron star matter in the power generator. Calculate the necessary rate of rotation to accomplish this task.
This question really has me stumped. Am I right to just ignore the fact that there is an inner control room ring?

This is what I think I will need:
We haven't gotten to inertia yet, but I think this is an inertia problem.
I = MR^2 (if I take out the inner ring and say it is a thin-walled hollow cylinder).
K = (1/2)*I*(omega)^2

I am not sure what I am suppose to do with the density of the core without a volume or mass. I am also not quite sure where I would bring in value of Earth's gravity to solve with. Am I missing something to be able to start this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does seem that they forgot to tell you how much neutron star matter is at the center. Assuming you can get that info, figure out the net force on a mass that is moving with the outer ring. (Hint: What kind of acceleration does that mass undergo?)
 
Well, it looks like there is an alternative version of this problem with everything the same except it asks you to find out the rate of rotation and the mass of the generator. So there must be a way somehow to find the mass. Or this problem is just really weird. :bugeye:

But it would be centripetal acceleration right? a_rad = v^2/r = (omega)^2 *r
So omega would be my rate of rotation... if there was no mass at the center? Wouldn't a mass that is on the outside ring just equal it's weight?
 
I strongly suspect that essential information is missing from the problem statement. Why were you told:
"A control room is a tube which goes all the way around the wheel and is 10 meters from its center."​
since that control room is never mentioned again?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top