Desperate: Residual activity of daughter in decay

tramar
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider harvesting a radioactive daughter product from a radioactive parent at regular intervals of time, \theta. If n samples of accumulated daughter product are removed at time \theta, 2\theta, ..., n\theta, show that the sum of their residual activities at time n\theta is just that which would have accumulated in the parent material had no separations been made.

Homework Equations


A_{1}(t)=A_{10}e^{-\lambda_{1}t}
A_{2}(t)=\frac{\lambda_{1A}}{\lambda_1}\frac{\lambda_{2}}{(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})}A_{1}(t)(1-e^{-(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})(t-t_{1})})

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to take the equation for A_{2}(t) given above and perform a sum from \theta all the way to n\theta for all of the residual activities. I tried to reduce that expression down so that it gave me A_{1}(t) but it seems impossible for the following reasons:

1) You end up left with the factor \frac{\lambda_{1A}}{\lambda_1}\frac{\lambda_{2}}{(\lambda_{2}-\lambda_{1})} on the left side and it is not on the right side.
2) The equation for A_{1}(t) has no \lambda_{2}, so I don't see how it can possibly equal any residual activity of the daughter.

This leads me to believe that I've interpreted the problem statement incorrectly...
If anyone can give me some insight, it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The quantity of the daughter at time t is A_1(0) \frac {\lambda_1 } { \lambda_2 - \lambda_1} (e^{- \lambda_1 t} - e^{- \lambda_2 t})

I don't see how you get that expression for A_2(t). What is the amount of the parent left at the time of removing batch k?. What is the amount of daughter in batch k at the time of its removal? The amount of daughter left in batch k after time n \theta

It seems all a rather pointless exercise, since it doesn't matter at all for radioactive decay if you separate the atoms in batches.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top