Destructive Interference in Sound Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving destructive interference of sound waves from two speakers. The speakers, spaced 4.45 m apart and emitting sound at a frequency of 140 Hz, create points of minimum sound intensity as a man walks towards the lower speaker. Participants calculate the wavelength of the sound wave to be 2.36 m and discuss the conditions for destructive interference, noting that sound cancels when the waves are out of phase by half a wavelength. The conversation highlights the need to determine the specific distances from the pole where the man will experience these minima. Overall, the thread emphasizes understanding wave properties and interference patterns in sound.
cmerickson21
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two speakers are driven by the same oscillator whose frequency is 140 Hz. They are located on a vertical pole a distance of 4.45 m apart from each other. A man walks straight toward the lower speaker in a direction perpendicular to the pole.
(a) How many times will he hear a minimum in sound intensity?
(b) How far is he from the pole at these moments? Take the speed of sound to be 330 m/s and ignore any sound reflections coming off the ground. (Give the first distances at which this happens.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cmerickson21 said:

Homework Statement


Two speakers are driven by the same oscillator whose frequency is 140 Hz. They are located on a vertical pole a distance of 4.45 m apart from each other. A man walks straight toward the lower speaker in a direction perpendicular to the pole.
(a) How many times will he hear a minimum in sound intensity?
(b) How far is he from the pole at these moments? Take the speed of sound to be 330 m/s and ignore any sound reflections coming off the ground. (Give the first distances at which this happens.)

Welcome to PF. You might want to read this first:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=785408&postcount=1

What formulas do you think apply?
 
I figured out that he hears a minimum twice. I have tried finding the wavelength and then using the Peak to Valley overlap equation which should apply to destructive interference where PVO=(m+.5)lamda m=0,1,2,3,... but that isn't working. What am I doing wrong should I not be using that equation? Do you have any ideas what I should be doing?
 
cmerickson21 said:
I figured out that he hears a minimum twice. I have tried finding the wavelength and then using the Peak to Valley overlap equation which should apply to destructive interference where PVO=(m+.5)lamda m=0,1,2,3,... but that isn't working. What am I doing wrong should I not be using that equation? Do you have any ideas what I should be doing?

First of all what do you calculate for the wave length of the 140 hz sound wave?

Second of all at what point will the sound from two sources cancel each other out? They must be out of phase by how much? Which is what part of a wavelength?
 
I found the wavelength to be 2.36 by taking the velocity=330/the frequency=140. The sound will cancel out when the peak of one wave overlaps a valley of the other. Which will be when they are out of phase by half a wavelength.
 
cmerickson21 said:
I found the wavelength to be 2.36 by taking the velocity=330/the frequency=140. The sound will cancel out when the peak of one wave overlaps a valley of the other. Which will be when they are out of phase by half a wavelength.

That's what I get. OK. So if you move away from speaker A say, chosen for convenience as the problem is symmetrical, at what point is it that the sound from speaker A is exactly 1/2 wavelength out of phase with the two speakers?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top