Destructive vs Constructive interference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the principles of destructive and constructive interference as experienced between two loudspeakers emitting sinusoidal waves at a frequency of 694 Hz. The wavelength is calculated to be 0.494 m, and the key takeaway is that to transition from a point of constructive interference to the first point of destructive interference, one must walk 0.124 m (1/4 of the wavelength) toward speaker B. This movement results in being 1/4 of the wavelength away from speaker A, achieving the necessary 1/2 wavelength difference for destructive interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave properties, specifically sinusoidal waves
  • Knowledge of interference patterns in wave physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of standing waves
  • Basic mathematical skills for calculating wavelength and distances
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of wave interference patterns
  • Learn about standing wave formation and its applications
  • Explore the effects of phase differences in wave interactions
  • Investigate real-world applications of constructive and destructive interference in acoustics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying wave physics, acoustics engineers, and anyone interested in understanding sound wave interactions and their practical implications.

RUphysics3
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two loudspeakers, A and B are driven by the same amplifier and emit sinusoidal waves in phase. The frequency of the waves emitted by each speaker is 694 hz. You are standing between the speakers, along the line connecting them and are at a point of constructive interference. How far must you walk toward speaker B to reach the first point of destructive interference?

Homework Equations


v=lambda/f

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know how to approach this, besides obviously solving for wavelength, .494 m . After this, i tried drawing pictures to relate things but didn't really know what I was doing. All I know is that constructive interference occurs in whole number integers of wavelength or something like that and destructive in n+ 1/2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you stand on the connecting line between the speakers, you will be exposed to two counterpropagating waves - what you will hear is a standing wave. Modelling the two waves as ##y_1(x,t) = A \sin(kx-\omega t)## and ##y_2(x,t) = A \sin(kx+\omega t)##, how does the superposition ##y_1+y_2## look like?
 
First, it helps to understand constructive interference which occurs when the the peaks of the 2 waves occur at the same time, the 2 waves are "in phase" with each other. In the adverse, destructive interference occurs when the peaks of one wave occur at the same time as the valleys in the other wave, the 2 waves are "out of phase" with each other.

Consider now, 2 speakers placed beside each other, emitting the same frequency wave and in the same direction. If you stand in front of the pair you will notice that the sound is louder than it would be from only one of the speakers, because the peaks and valleys are in phase, as above. If we move one speaker further away by a distance of 1/2 of the frequency, the peaks and valleys will be out of phase and there will be a noticeable decrease in volume and potentially no sound will be heard at all. If we move the speaker further back to equal the distance of the length of the frequency, the 2 waves will again be in phase and the sound will again be louder.

Now, with your example of having the 2 identical speakers facing each other, standing at the middle point will again have the 2 waves in phase with each other. When we move closer to one speaker, we are also moving away from the other speaker by the same amount. If our goal is to stand at a point that is equal in length to 1/2 of the frequency to achieve destructive interference, we need to move 1/4 of the length toward one speaker which will also put us 1/4 of the length away from the other, which will give us the 1/2 length we require.

Hth. :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K