Detection of Elementary Particles

Universe_Man
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
By what means do scientists detect the presence of elementary particles? How do we know what we are looking at through these means of detection?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good place to start for an introduction to collider detectors is at the particle adventure:

http://particleadventure.org/particleadventure/frameless/modern_detect.html

That section gives a very introductory overview of how collider experments work and how the data is interpreted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Universe_Man said:
By what means do scientists detect the presence of elementary particles? How do we know what we are looking at through these means of detection?
To detect means to establish a situation (an experiment) in which the 'elementary particle' in question interacts with the system (or particles in the system), or as BenLillie indicated, fundamental particles (electrons) or composites (e.g. protons, composites of quarks) can be collided. The result of that interaction is 'detected'.

The elementary particles are the 'smallest' individual particles, e.g. leptons like the neutrinos and electron (positron), quarks (which make up mesons and baryons), and then others like gluons, bosons, gravitons, . . . . The latter group is much harder to detect, and must be inferred indirectly from the particles that are detected.

From the link provided by BenLillie -
The Standard Model answers many of the questions about the structure and stability of matter with its six types of quarks, six types of leptons, and four forces. But the Standard Model is not complete; there are still many unanswered questions.
 
Universe_Man said:
By what means do scientists detect the presence of elementary particles? How do we know what we are looking at through these means of detection?

Straight into my profession.
A good place to start, apart from the good, already mentionned link, is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_detector

There's a long list of different techniques to detect particles, all of which, by today, are electronic.

The basic principle of any particle detector today is the interaction of CHARGED particles with matter, which takes on two forms:
-excitation
-ionisation

Indeed, point charges which traverse matter at high speed cause these two phenomena to happen. Once these phenomena took place in matter, you still have to have a means of observing them. Excitation can give rise to light emission, in which case, you try to detect the light (and in the end, try to ionise matter one way or another, like a photocathode on a PM). In the end, you're after ionisation. Why ?
Because the application of an electric field let's you guide the hence obtained charges (ions but preferably electrons), and there is an effect which is often exploited: HIGH electric fields give rise to avalanches.
The electrons accelerate in the high electric field, and become ionizing charges in themselves. This has the potential of AMPLIFYING the original ionisation charge. In the end, you try to observe the movement of all these charges by placing electrodes somewhere: moving charges induce CURRENTS in nearby electrodes.

Almost all particle detectors operate in one way or another on this principle: the initial charged particle ionises matter, this gives (often) rise to SEVERAL electrical charges, which are then guided and accelerated by an electrostatic field, which can give rise to secondary ionisations and which ultimately give rise to moving charges inducing electrical currents in electrodes.

Amplifiers connected to these electrodes then amplify these (tiny) currents, and this goes into a data acquisition system.

A few examples:

*) gas detectors (the old working horse). Fast charges create little clouds of ions and electrons in the gas. These drift along the lines of an electrostatic field. Sometimes, this is enough: the movement of these charges induces currents in electrodes: we have an ionisation chamber.
Sometimes, the E-field is very strong, and we get gas amplification (the initial electron becomes itself an ionising particle, etc..). We have now proportional detectors, or streamer tubes, or geiger counters
Wires or strips or other electrodes configure the E-field and serve as induction electrodes.

*) photomultipliers: the photon liberates an electron of the photocathode which is then accelerated in an E-field in vacuum, hitting a "dynode" where several electrons are liberated, to the next dynode etc... until a very large number of electrons arrive at an anode: their movement induces a current pulse in the anode.

*) silicon detectors: very similar to gas detectors, but the medium is now silicon, and the charged particles are electrons and holes.

Now, what happens if we want to observe *neutral* particles ? Well, we need a fundamental interaction with the neutral particle to generate light, or charged particles. For instance, gamma radiation needs to interact with matter (photo-electric effect, compton effect, or pair production) which liberates electrons. Fast neutrons can hit elastically a nucleus, which becomes a charged particle (the fast-moving nucleus).
Slow neutrons need to interact through a nuclear interaction with matter (for instance, fission in U-235).
Neutrinos are harder.
 
vanesch said:
*) gas detectors (the old working horse)...
I have read somewhere that the principle of bubble chambers is used for "superheated droplet detectors" that are used to detect hypotetical WIMPs. Can you say something about these detectors or do you know some informative page about it? Thanks.
 
hellfire said:
I have read somewhere that the principle of bubble chambers is used for "superheated droplet detectors" that are used to detect hypotetical WIMPs. Can you say something about these detectors or do you know some informative page about it? Thanks.
I believe the principal of bubble chambers is similar to that of cloud chambers which use "supersaturation", such that the vapor condenses to liquid along the paths of the particles. In the case of superheated liquid, the particles would increase the energy so the liquid phase is transformed to vapor along the path.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubble_chamber
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top