Detection of gravitational waves

AI Thread Summary
LIGO is currently the leading gravitational wave detector, but its event rate is low, with only about three detections expected per century. An upgraded version, Advanced LIGO, is anticipated to be ten times more sensitive, potentially detecting a thousand times more sources annually, particularly compact binaries like black holes and neutron stars. The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is set to launch around 2019-2020, offering the ability to detect lower frequency sources such as white dwarf binaries and extreme mass ratio events due to its space-based design. The sensitivity of these instruments is crucial for identifying 'low-hanging' sources of gravitational waves. Overall, advancements in detection technology are paving the way for more frequent and varied gravitational wave observations.
Ranku
Messages
433
Reaction score
18
What is the state-of-the-art of detecting gravity waves. Are the instruments available now sufficiently sensitive to detect gravity waves? Have we identified 'low-hanging' sources from whom gravity waves should have been detectable. Have we yet reached that point where serious questions are arising as to the direct detectiblity of gravity waves?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna)
LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory)
 
To add some detail to the above;

LIGO is the current state of the art right now. However, its expected event rate is about 3 per century if I recall correctly, so it isn't terribly surprising that we haven't seen any yet. An upgraded version of LIGO called Advanced LIGO should be ready in 2014. It is about 10 times more sensitive than LIGO, and can thus see 1000 times more sources, so it should see a good amount of events every year. Its best sources are compact binaries (black holes or neutron stars). In ~2019-2020 LISA should come online. It is a gravitational wave observatory in space. Since it isn't limited by seismic noise, it can see sources with lower frequencies sources like white dwarf binaries, and extreme mass ratio events. This image illustrates their sensitivity curves: http://imgur.com/VDNpR
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top