Determine center point of offset circle

examorph
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
I am working on an algorithm which requires the coordinates for the center point of an offset circle. Dimensions available to find this are shown in the image below and the dimension required is labeled as X:
Circle Centre.JPG

The point at the very left of the arc is a quadrant therefore, the circle center also 2.27 away from the line with a dimension of 3. The actual value of x in this example is 2.47 (rounded), this was found using CAD however, I am trying to find an mathematical relation for this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sorry, what is the significance of the line with length 3? At the moment all I'm seeing is an arc of a partial circle and then a line which doesn't seem to have any bearing on the characteristics of the circle.
 
I apologize for the confusion. Where I said "Circle" I should have said "Arc". All dimensions shown above are just what are available and not necessarily needed to determine the center point of the arc however, I think that in the case of the line with length 3, it would be useful as the combination of this with the distance 2.27 shows coordinates to a point on the arc.
 
It's an arc of a circle just to be clear though. We could always have drawn in the rest of this circle with dotted lines. So then the right end of the line segment of length 3 lies on this circle, correct?

edit: But then if that were the case, then the value of x would simply be (4.5-3)+3/2 = 3.

Unless there is some particular reason as to why the segment has a given length of 3, then the question can't be answered.
 
Last edited:
Actaully, there is sufficient information. Recall the 4.5 dimension.

OP indicates that radius is tangent at upper left point (let's call it point "A").
Let's use that point (A) as an origin in the x,y plane.

The equation of a circle is (x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2 = r^2 where point (a,b) is the center of the circle of radius r.

Since circle is tangent at point A, then a = r and the center lies on this axis, thus, b = 0.

The coorindates of the lower right point (let's call it "B") is as follows
x_b = 4.5 - 3.0 = 1.5
y_b = -2.27

Thus, the circle must satisfy
(x_b - a)^2 + (y_b - b)^2 = r^2
or
(x_b - r)^2 + (y_b - 0)^2 = r^2

==> r = ( (x_b)^2 + (y_b)^2 ) / ( 2 * x_b)

numerically,
r = 1.5^2 + (-2.27)^2 / (2 * 1.5)
= 2.47
 
Ahh you're right! Good work!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top