Determine if a function is strictly increasing/decreasing

  • Thread starter Thread starter tompenny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the function \( f(x) = x + \frac{1}{(x+1)} \) is strictly increasing or decreasing based on its derivative \( f'(x) = 1 - \frac{1}{(1+x)^2} \). Participants are examining the intervals derived from the derivative and the implications of extreme points on the behavior of the function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to identify the correct intervals for where the function is strictly increasing or decreasing, expressing uncertainty about the use of brackets at extreme points. Other participants question the possibility of a function being both strictly increasing and decreasing at the same point, leading to discussions about the definitions involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations and assumptions, with some providing insights into the nature of increasing and decreasing functions. There is a recognition of the need for clarity regarding the behavior of the function at extreme points, and some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the intervals.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the definitions of strictly increasing and decreasing functions, particularly in relation to single points and intervals. The original poster's uncertainty about the inclusion of endpoints in their intervals is a focal point of the conversation.

tompenny
Messages
15
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Determine where a function is strictly increasing/decreasing
Relevant Equations
$$f(x)=x+\frac{1}{(x+1)}$$
Hi there.

I have the following function:

$$f(x)=x+\frac{1}{(x+1)}$$

I've caculated the derivative to:

$$f'(x)=1-\frac{1}{(1+x)^2}$$

And the domain to: $$(-\infty, -1)\cup(-1, \infty)$$

I've also found two extreme point: $$x=0, x=-2$$

I know that a function is strictly increasing if:
$$f'(x)> 0$$
and strictly decreasing if:
$$f'(x)< 0$$

I've calculated the intervalls where the funtcion is strictly increasing to:
$$(-\infty, -2]\cup[0, \infty)$$
and strictly decreasing to:
$$[-2, -1)\cup(-1, 0]$$

My question is if this is correct or if the intervalls should be:
$$(-\infty, -2)\cup(0, \infty)$$ and $$(-2, -1)\cup(-1, 0)$$ instead?
As you can notice I'm very unsecure whether I should use ( or [ at the extremum points?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you:)

http://asciimath.org/
http://docs.mathjax.org/en/v1.1-latest/tex.html#supported-latex-commands
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can a function be strictly increasing and strictly decreasing at the same point?
 
I really don't know.. are you referring to the extremum point at x=-2?
 
tompenny said:
I really don't know.. are you referring to the extremum point at x=-2?
Yes. In your first solution you have the two points where ##f'(x) = 0## (i.e. ##x = 0## and ## x = -2##) as both strictly incraesing and strictly decreasing. That makes no sense.

Your second solution has got to be right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tompenny
PeroK said:
Can a function be strictly increasing and strictly decreasing at the same point?

It depends on what you mean by "strictly increasing at x".

A function is strictly increasing or decreasing on some subset of its domain. It can't be strictly increasing or decreasing on a subset consisting of a single point, because the definitions don't really make sense in that case.[1]

Here we have:

It is true that f is strictly increasing on [0,\infty).
It is true that f is strictly decreasing on (-1,0].

On the other hand, if by "f is strictly increasing at x" you mean "there is an open neighbourhood of x on which f is strictly increasing" then f is not strictly increasing or decreasing at 0.

[1]: If X consists of a single point then (\forall x \in X)(\forall y \in X) ((x &lt; y) \implies (f(x) &lt; f(y))) and (\forall x \in X)(\forall y \in X) ((x &lt; y) \implies (f(x) &gt; f(y))) are true, because whatever the choice of x and y the implications reduce to "false implies false", which is a true statement.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K