Determine the Distance for Balancing Uneven Weights

  • Thread starter Thread starter dyan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance
dyan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
does anyone no of a math formula to balance uneven weights?

say if i had a 100g (3.5oz) weight on a bar 100mm (3.9in) from a center point and another weight of 150g (5.5oz) how far will it need to be from the center to level the bar.

could it be as simple as double the weight double the distance?

thanks Dylan
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not exactly. In order to balance, the lighter weight (less mass) must be farther from the fulcrum. It is, instead "double the weight halve the distance". This is more a physics question that mathematics: two objects will balance when their 'torques' about the fulcrum are equal. And torque is equal to weight times distance from the fulcrum. The 100 gram mass has weight 100 g dynes (the "g" here is the acceleration due to gravity" 981 cm/s2 in cgs units. I assume your "g" was "grams".) A distance 100 mm= 10 cm from the fulcrum, it will cause torque of 1000g ergs about the fulcrum. Similarly a mass of 150 grams will have weight 150g dynes and at distance x cm from the fulcrum has torque 150 gx ergs. Setting those equal, 150gx= 1000g so x= 1000g/150g= 100/15= 20/3= (2/3)10 cm.

Notice that 150 is NOT "double" 100- it is 3/2 of it so we get 2/3 the distance.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top