Determine the magnet's poles from an image

  • Thread starter Thread starter kakadas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Poles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the north and south poles of a magnet and the magnetic field of a wire. Participants explore the application of the Right Hand Rule to determine the magnetic field direction but express confusion regarding the poles of the wire's magnetic field. It is clarified that magnetic field lines are continuous and encircle the wire, meaning there are no distinct entry or exit points to define poles. Consequently, unlike traditional magnets, the wire does not have defined north and south poles. The conversation emphasizes the unique nature of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying wires.
kakadas
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



33jqpsm.jpg


Homework Equations



Where are the north and south poles of this magnet?

Where are the north and south poles of the wire's magnetic field?

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the Right hand rule to determine the magnetic field of the wire, but I got confused when trying to find the north and south poles of the wire's magnetic field...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a trick question. Does that help?

Think about the lines of magnetic field from a wire carrying a current. Where do they begin and end?
 
So, no one can crack this?

I'm sure this is solvable, i just lack the knowledge abut the lines of a magnetic field..

Anyone?
 
Magnetic field lines are continuous, that is they link up with themselves. So even with a "normal" magnet the lines go right into and through the material. We say that the region where the lines exit the material is the north and where they enter is the south pole, but in the case of the wire the lines do not enter or leave it, they just encircle it, so there is no entry or exit point and thus no poles.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top