Determine the sêcific Mobius transformation

  • Thread starter Thread starter awkwardnerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
awkwardnerd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The function f(x) is not defined for x = 0. It has the property that for all nonzero real numbers x, f(x) + 2f(1/x) = 3x. Find all values of a such that f(a) = f(-a)

2. The function f is defined by f(x) = (ax+b)/(cx+d), where a, b, c, and d are nonzero real numbers, and has the properties: f(19) = 19, f(97) = 97, and f(f(x) = x for all values of x except -d/c. Find the unique number that is not in the range of f.

First time seeing this. Somehow tell me how to approach it, I don't need the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


awkwardnerd said:
1. The function f(x) is not defined for x = 0. It has the property that for all nonzero real numbers x, f(x) + 2f(1/x) = 3x. Find all values of a such that f(a) = f(-a)
Start by evaluating f(a) and f(-a), and setting these expressions equal.
awkwardnerd said:
2. The function f is defined by f(x) = (ax+b)/(cx+d), where a, b, c, and d are nonzero real numbers, and has the properties: f(19) = 19, f(97) = 97, and f(f(x) = x for all values of x except -d/c. Find the unique number that is not in the range of f.
Since f(f(x)) = x, f is its own inverse. How do you normally go about finding the inverse of a function?
awkwardnerd said:
First time seeing this. Somehow tell me how to approach it, I don't need the answer.
 


For part one notice that
f(x) + 2f(1/x)= 3x
f(1/x) + 2f(x) = 3/x

So it is possible to get an explicit equation for f(x) by adding both equations and some algebra.

a should be sqrt(2).
 


Very, very clever! But actually, there are two values of a, \sqrt{2} and -\sqrt{2}.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Very, very clever! But actually, there are two values of a, \sqrt{2} and -\sqrt{2}.
XD. Yeah I forgot about the +/- thing for square roots.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top