Determine the tensions in the two cords

  • Thread starter Thread starter student 1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three objects connected on a rough table with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.350. The objects have masses of 4.00 kg, 1.00 kg, and 2.00 kg, and the pulleys are frictionless. Participants are tasked with drawing free body diagrams for each object and determining the acceleration and tensions in the cords.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express uncertainty about drawing free body diagrams and relating them to one another. There are discussions about the forces acting on each block, including tensions and friction. Some participants question the direction of forces and the application of Newton's second law.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to clarify the forces acting on the blocks and the relationships between them. Some participants have begun to formulate equations based on their understanding, while others are still grappling with the concepts. There is no explicit consensus, but productive dialogue is occurring regarding the setup of equations and the roles of different forces.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention issues with attachments that need approval, which may be affecting the clarity of the discussion. There is also an emphasis on ensuring that the free body diagrams are correct before proceeding with calculations.

student 1
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three objects are connected on a table. The rough table has a coefficient of kinetic friction of .350. The objects have masses of 4.00 kg. 1.00 kg and 2.00 kg. The pulleys are frictionless. Draw a free body diagram for each object. A.) Determine the acceleration of each object and their directions. B.) determine the tensions in the two cords.


Homework Equations


Sum of Force=MA


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not exactly sure how to draw the free body diagrams and relate them to one another. I know the Acceleration and tensions are going to be the same, but I have to make sure my free body diagrams are correct and I'm not sure how to do that.View attachment phy1.bmp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
student 1 said:

Homework Statement


Three objects are connected on a table. The rough table has a coefficient of kinetic friction of .350. The objects have masses of 4.00 kg. 1.00 kg and 2.00 kg. The pulleys are frictionless. Draw a free body diagram for each object. A.) Determine the acceleration of each object and their directions. B.) determine the tensions in the two cords.


Homework Equations


Sum of Force=MA


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not exactly sure how to draw the free body diagrams and relate them to one another. I know the Acceleration and tensions are going to be the same, but I have to make sure my free body diagrams are correct and I'm not sure how to do that.View attachment 14465
As I said in your other post, I cannot as yet see your attachments, but as before the tensions in the two different ropes are necessarily the same.
 
Ok I don't know what's wrong with the attachments. I'll just keep trying.
 
student 1 said:
Ok I don't know what's wrong with the attachments. I'll just keep trying.
The attachments must be approved by a mentor before they are viewable. It shouldn't be too long before they are approved.
 
Anybody? I know the two blocks off the table have forces of T-Mg. and the one in the middle has T1 acting on it and T2 acting on it with the coefficient of friction stating it has .35 more force than normal acting on it. I just need to know how to determine all the forces acting on the middle one.
 
student 1 said:
Anybody? I know the two blocks off the table have forces of T-Mg. and the one in the middle has T1 acting on it and T2 acting on it with the coefficient of friction stating it has .35 more force than normal acting on it. I just need to know how to determine all the forces acting on the middle one.
Okay, so the first thing to decide is in which direction is the middle block going to move, then you assign a sign convention.
 
Ok so the force in x direction would be the tension of the string connected to the 4kg - Tension on the 2 kg. Would the friction be subtracted from this as well?
 
Ok I have my Force for the 4 block as T4-M4g, and the force for the 2 block T2-M2g. When I sat them equal to each other because of their acceleration equals one another. Everything subtracts itself and becomes zero. This is not what I need to happen is it? I'm left with 2a=0
 
student 1 said:
Ok so the force in x direction would be the tension of the string connected to the 4kg - Tension on the 2 kg. Would the friction be subtracted from this as well?
Yes you also need to include the frictional force.
student 1 said:
Ok I have my Force for the 4 block as T4-M4g, and the force for the 2 block T2-M2g.
This is almost correct. For the 4kg block you sign convention has the tension acting in the same direction as the motion and the weight acting in the opposite direction to motion. Does that same logical to you? (The force on the 2kg block is correct).

Now, once you have re-written the sum of the forces on the 1kg block to include friction you can apply Newton's second law to each block individually to produce a system of three equations.

Do you follow?
 
  • #10
Yea, I believe so, since the block is moving down the Forces on the 4kg block would be T4+M4G , or M4g-T, this part is confusing me! I would say M4g-T but I'm so confused on this I have no clue.
 
  • #11
student 1 said:
Yea, I believe so, since the block is moving down the Forces on the 4kg block would be T4+M4G , or M4g-T, this part is confusing me! I would say M4g-T but I'm so confused on this I have no clue.
Are the two forces acting in the same direction that the 4kg mass moves or in the opposite direction?
 
  • #12
I was thinking in opposite directions. Because the one block has friction on it holding the 4 block up.
 
  • #13
student 1 said:
I was thinking in opposite directions. Because the one block has friction on it holding the 4 block up.
You are correct! I was just making sure you understood why, guessing is a bad habit to get into :wink:. Okay so let's summarise what you have so far:

[tex]\sum F_4 = 4g - T_4[/tex]

[tex]\sum F_2 = T_2 - 2g[/tex]

Do you follow? Can you now do the same for the 1kg block, taking into account friction?
 
  • #14
yea that's what I have however when I solve for T in them it seems everything subtracts out to be zero? and I end up with Just A. The One block would be T4-T2-F
 
  • #15
student 1 said:
yea that's what I have however when I solve for T in them it seems everything subtracts out to be zero? and I end up with Just A. The One block would be T4-T2-F
Correct, so now we have three forces:

[tex]\sum F_1 = T_4 - T_2 - \mu g[/tex]

[tex]\sum F_2 = T_2 - 2g[/tex]

[tex]\sum F_4 = 4g - T_4[/tex]

Instead of subtracting the equations, can you apply Newton's second law to each one individually?
 
  • #16
Thats what I believe I'm doing. I have T4=-4a+39.2 i set 39.2-(4A+39.2)=4a everything cancels out and I'm left with nothing.
 
  • #17
student 1 said:
Thats what I believe I'm doing. I have T4=-4a+39.2 i set 39.2-(4A+39.2)=4a everything cancels out and I'm left with nothing.
I'm not quite sure what you doing. Start by explicitly writing down the three equations and we'll take it from there.
 
  • #18
Ok well i tried it another way pluggin my T4 and T2 in The force of one equation and I came up with the acceleration as 3.23 and plugged that in and found the T4=12.92 and T2=26.06 Would that seem reasonalble?
 
  • #19
student 1 said:
Ok well i tried it another way pluggin my T4 and T2 in The force of one equation and I came up with the acceleration as 3.23 and plugged that in and found the T4=12.92 and T2=26.06 Would that seem reasonalble?
I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to say what would be reasonable. However, I would suggest plugging those values into all the original equations to see of they are consistent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K