Determine the time required for a missile to reach its maximum altitude of 21 km

AI Thread Summary
To determine the time required for a missile to reach a maximum altitude of 21 km, the relevant equation is d = v_i t + 1/2 at^2. Given that the initial velocity (v_i) is 0 and acceleration (a) is not provided, the problem lacks sufficient information to solve for time directly. The acceleration due to gravity (-9.81 m/s^2) is not applicable since the missile is ascending, not falling. The discussion suggests using the quadratic formula to solve the equation, but emphasizes that without additional data on the missile's speed or acceleration, a definitive answer cannot be reached. Ultimately, the problem highlights the need for more information to accurately calculate the time to maximum altitude.
goracheski
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The U-2 was an American spy plane capable of flying up to 21 km high at speeds over 600km/h. Determine the time required for the missile to reach its maximum altitude of the U-2.

Homework Equations


d=v_i t+1/2 at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


d=21000m
a=-9.81m/s^2
v_i=0
t=?

I don't know how to get time by itself and I have tried using the quadratic formula.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i'm confused by this question. there is a missle but you are given no information as its speed (initial or final), or it's acceleration? something is missing here. if the only thing you know is the distance (21000m) then the best you can accomplish is an equation made up of the unknown variables.

there is little more you can do without any other info. you would not use the acceleration due to gravity as there is no suggestion that anything is falling - you only indicate that a missile is headed upwards.

EDIT: the best answer you can probably get is to solve the quadratic:

1/2at^2 + Vi - 2100 = 0

there use -b +/- sqrt( b^2 - 4ac) / 2a
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top