Determine whether or not is a Hermitian operator

dje
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The operator F is defined by Fψ(x)=ψ(x+a) + ψ(x-a), where a is a nonzero constant. Determine whether or not F is a Hermitian operator.


Homework Equations



∫(x+a)d/dx + (x-a)d/dxψ



The Attempt at a Solution



f = (1=ax) + (1-ax)ψ

What are the steps I need to do to figure this out. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No matter the value of a, one can show that F is bounded, so the adjoint of it exists. Then all you need is to check is the hermiticity condition in integral form:

\int dx \psi^{*}(x) F\psi(x) = ?

Try to get the psi with exchanged argument under the complex conjugate sign.
 
I am not sure of these steps but I will try. Can you show me if I am still not understanding this. thanks.

Fψ(x)=Fψ(x+a) + ψ(x-a) Fτ= F to be Hermitian
Fψ (x+a) + (x-a) = F dt/dx? (x+a) + (x-a)

= F dt/dx (x + a) + (x-a)

∫(x+a)d/dx + (x-a)d/dx ψ



F τ= (1+ax)ψ + (1-ax)ψ



KEY= * below/symbol I am wanting here is circle with vertical line through it.
(θ*/ψ) = (ψ/θ*)
θ* (x) ψ(x+a) + ψ(x-a) dt/dx dx
= ψ(x +a) + ψ (x-a) dθ*/dx dx

Solution- F is Hermitian operator Fτ= F
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top