Determining Capacitance in Different Kinds of Capacitors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the equivalent capacitance between points x and y in various capacitor networks. It clarifies the rules for capacitors in series and parallel configurations, emphasizing that parallel capacitors share equal voltage while series capacitors share equal charge. The user attempts to solve specific problems, initially calculating equivalent capacitance for different arrangements, including diagonal placements and series combinations. Corrections are provided to ensure accurate calculations, leading to a final equivalent capacitance of 2C0 for one of the configurations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding capacitor arrangements for accurate capacitance determination.
sweetdion
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Determine the equivalent capacitance (in terms of C0) between points x and y of each network of capacitors shown.
100_0214.png


Homework Equations



For capacitors connected in parallel, Ceq=C1+C2+...Cn

For capacitors connected in series,
Ceq=1/C1+1/C2+...1/Cn

The Attempt at a Solution


This is my first time learning about capacitors, and I am just learning about the difference between series and parallel capacitors. Sometimes it's hard for me to tell the difference, especially with some of the different geometries that are given. I know that in parallel capacitors, capacitors are connecting with equal voltage drops across the capacitors, and in series capacitors, capacitors are connected with equal charges on the capacitors. First, I think I should combine the capacitors in parallel to get Ceq', then combine the remaining capacitors in series into one final Ceq.

a)So, to take this slowly, with part a, the two capacitors that are opposite to each other are parallel. So Ceq'=2C0 Now to combine it with the remaining capacitor in series, Ceq=1/2C0 + 1/C0 = 3/2C0

b) I'm not sure what to do when they are diagonal to each other. Are they series?

c) In the top box there is 2C0 in the bottom box there is 2C0, since they are in series, Ceq=1/2C0+1/2C0=1/C0

d) Same problem with B.

Thanks in advance,
sweetdion
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) Ceq=1/2C0 + 1/C0 = 3/2C0
It should be
1/Ceq=1/2C0 + 1/C0 = 3/2C0
b)Al the three are in parallel, one plate of each capacitor is connected to x and the other to y.
c) 1/ceq = 1/co
d) Left and right branches are in series, the the parallel combination.
 
b) Ceq=2C0+C0+C0=4C0
d) 1/Ceqleft=1/C0+1/C0 ---> Ceqleft = C0/2 = Ceqright
Ceqtot=C0/2 + C0/2 + C0 --->2C0
correct?
 
Correct.
 
Thanks a lot for your help!:smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top