Determining charge from electric potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the charge q on a metal sphere and a hollow spherical shell given a potential difference of 500 V. The equation used is ΔV=q/K [(1/ra)-(1/rb)], but the initial calculation yielded an unreasonably large value for q. A participant pointed out a potential error in the placement of the constant K in the equation. The correct value of K is 1/4∏ε0, which was overlooked in the initial attempt. This correction is crucial for accurately determining the charge.
rmcgovern
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A metal sphere with radius ra = 1.20 cm is supported on an insulating stand at the center of a hollow, metal, spherical shell with radius rb = 9.00 cm. Charge +q is put on the inner sphere and charge -q on the outer spherical shell. The magnitude of q is chosen to make the potential difference between the spheres 500 V, with the inner sphere at higher potential. Calculate q.


Homework Equations



ΔV=q/K [(1/ra)-(1/rb)]


The Attempt at a Solution



Solving for q from the eqn above I have reached q= ΔV/[(1/ra)-(1/rb)] * K. By simply plugging in the numbers given I reached a soln of q= 6.23*10^10 C. This answer seemed far too large to be right, and indeed it is not correct. Is this the proper equation to use in this situation? I double checked the math and it appears everything is right, does anyone see where I may have gone wrong? Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rmcgovern said:
ΔV=q/K [(1/ra)-(1/rb)]

Hi rmcgovern. Welcome to PF!

Did you put the constant K in the correct location in your equation for ΔV?
 
ah! I forgot that K=1/4∏ε0. a rather trivial error. thank you for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top