Determining hydrostatic force on a sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the hydrostatic forces on a submerged solid sphere, specifically the vertical and horizontal forces exerted by water. The vertical force is derived by integrating the differential pressure across the sphere's surface, resulting in a formula that confirms the buoyant force as F_V = (4/3)πR³γ. For the horizontal force, it is suggested that the integration should consider the symmetry of the sphere, leading to the conclusion that the horizontal forces cancel out, resulting in a net force of zero. The importance of correctly setting up the coordinate system is emphasized to accurately evaluate the forces. Overall, the discussion highlights the necessity of proper integration techniques and understanding of hydrostatic principles in determining forces on submerged objects.
thebrennus
Messages
2
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A solid sphere with radius ##R## is submerged on water at a depth ##h_1##. Water's specific weight is ##\gamma##.
Determine both horizontal and vertical forces exerted by the water on the surface of the sphere, in terms of ##R## and ##\gamma##.

Homework Equations


My lecturer wants the solution to be achieved by integrating the differential pressure of the sphere, so I believe the only relevant equations are ##F = p A## and ##p = (p_0 + \gamma h)##. I am also assuming ##p_0 = 0##

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by decomposing the resultant force on the surface of the sphere into its vertical and horizontal components, allowing me to write: ##F_V = F \sin\theta## and ##F_H = F \cos\theta##

3.1. The vertical force
So I divide the sphere into differential rings with area ##dA = 2\pi R^2 \cos\theta dθ##
If ##F_V = F \sin\theta##, then ##dF_V = dF \sin\theta##, but ##dF = p dA## and ##p = (p_0 + \gamma h)##, which yields:
$$dF_V = (p_0 + \gamma h) (2\pi R^2 \cos\theta dθ) \sin\theta$$
The point where I'm evaluating ##h## is ##h = h_1 + R - R\sin\theta##, so we have:
$$dF_V = \gamma (h_1 + R - R\sin\theta) (2\pi R^2 \cos\theta dθ) \sin\theta$$
Finally, the vertical force is given by:
$$F_V = \gamma 2\pi R^2 \left[h_1 \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin\theta \cos\theta\, d\theta + R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin\theta \cos\theta\, d\theta - R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin^2\theta \cos\theta\, d\theta\right]$$
Solving the integral we have:
$$F_V = \gamma 2\pi R^2 * (2 R /3) \rightarrow F_V = \frac 4 3 \pi R^3 \gamma$$
Which I believe is the correct answer since it is the buoyancy of a sphere.

3.2 The horizontal force
As far as I know, the method for solving this should be the same as before. The only difference I can see is that the horizontal force is given by ##F_H = F \cos\theta##, so the equation is:
$$F_H = \gamma 2\pi R^2 \left[h_1 \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \cos^2\theta\, d\theta + R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \cos^2\theta\, d\theta - R \int_{\frac \pi 2}^{\frac {3\pi} 2} \sin\theta \cos^2\theta\, d\theta\right]$$
Solving the above integral yields:
$$F_V = \gamma 2\pi R^2 * (h_1\frac \pi 2 + R\frac \pi 2) \rightarrow F_V = \pi^2 R^2 \gamma[h_1 + R]$$
However I am pretty sure that this is wrong. Since the whole sphere is submerged there should be forces cancelling themselves out so that the horizontal force should be just zero. Besides, this solution is in terms of ##h_1##, and my lecturer explicitly said the answer shouldn't be in therms of any variables other than ##R## and ##h_1##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you redo your coordinate system and use a standard spherical with ## \theta ## being the polar angle measured from the vertical (upward z) direction and ## dA=2 \pi R^2sin(\theta) \, d \theta ## because of the ## \phi ## symmetry. The angle ## \theta ## will then vary from ## 0 ## to ## \pi ##. The vertical force is the z-component. For the horizontal force, you will need to consider the ## x ## and ## y ## components and integrate over ## \phi ##. The horizontal component will have a ## sin(\theta) ## just as the vertical has a ## cos(\theta) ##, but it is the ## \phi ## integrals that will give you the zero answer for the horizontal (x and y) components. For the vertical (z component), the integral over ## d \phi ## is just ## 2 \pi ##. For the x and y components, the ## sin(\phi) ## or ## cos(\phi) ## terms integrate to ## 0 ## when integrated from ## 0 ## to ## 2 \pi ##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes thebrennus
Charles Link said:
I suggest you redo your coordinate system and use a standard spherical with ## \theta ## being the polar angle measured from the vertical (upward z) direction and ## dA=2 \pi R^2sin(\theta) \, d \theta ## because of the ## \phi ## symmetry. The angle ## \theta ## will then vary from ## 0 ## to ## \pi ##. The vertical force is the z-component. For the horizontal force, you will need to consider the ## x ## and ## y ## components and integrate over ## \phi ##. The horizontal component will have a ## sin(\theta) ## just as the vertical has a ## cos(\theta) ##, but it is the ## \phi ## integrals that will give you the zero answer for the horizontal (x and y) components. For the vertical (z component), the integral over ## d \phi ## is just ## 2 \pi ##. For the x and y components, the ## sin(\phi) ## or ## cos(\phi) ## terms integrate to ## 0 ## when integrated from ## 0 ## to ## 2 \pi ##.
Thank you so much for your answer, it does make sense. I didn't really think about the coordinate system before
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top