Determining metres that a frequency produces

  • Thread starter Thread starter SoConfused__
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance traveled by a 256 Hz tuning fork with an amplitude of 1.0 mm over 2.0 seconds. The correct understanding of cycles is crucial; each cycle involves the fork moving 4 mm (1 mm left and 1 mm right). With a frequency of 256 Hz, the tuning fork completes 512 cycles in 2 seconds. Therefore, the total distance traveled is 512 cycles multiplied by 0.004 m per cycle, resulting in 2.0 meters. Clarification on the relationship between frequency, cycles, and distance is essential for solving the problem accurately.
SoConfused__
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The end of a 256 Hz tuning fork has an average amplitude of 1.0 mm for 2.0 seconds. How many metres does the end of the tuning fork travel in this time.

(The answer is also given in the back of the textbook, which is 2.0m).


Homework Equations


v = f * lambda, I believe.
f = cycles/seconds


The Attempt at a Solution


Well this is what I'm thinking. One wavelength would be 4mm. To the left, rest position, right, and back at resposition. (Each time the fork vibrates left & right it goes 1mm out).

Therefore 1 cycle = 4mm (0.004m)
(2/0.004m)
So, would the period be 500 metres per s?

So how many metres does the end of the tuning fork travel in 2 seconds?
Well.. wouldn't it be 1000 metres?

The answer says 2metres though. I think I don't have an understanding of the question. If someone could explain, I would very much appreciate it. Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your number of 4 mm per cycle is correct. For this tuning fork, how many cycles are there in 2 seconds?
 
Erm... 0.25?
 
No frequency is cycles per second. How do you get 0.25?
 
Another name for 1 Hz is "one cycle per second."
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top