Determining optimum flywheel dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the dimensions of a flanged free-spinning flywheel to maximize its moment of inertia while minimizing mass, under specific design constraints. The user has modeled the flywheel as two hollow cylinders and is using calculus and Excel for iterative calculations to analyze the relationship between moment of inertia (MOI) and mass against the variable radius (r2). They found that an r2 of 42.5 mm yields a maximum spin time of approximately 460 seconds, while an r2 of 28 mm results in 550 seconds. The user is also considering the impact of hybrid bearings, which require a minimum radial load of 16.4 N, and is questioning the significance of the mass at the optimal r2. Clarification is sought on the method of subtracting mass from the calculations.
motoxYogi
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am currently doing a design project on gyroscopes.
My question concerns the flywheel design, specifically trying to determine the dimensions of a flanged free-spinning flywheel to maximize the moment of inertia while trying to minimize the mass, given certain design constraints.
I've treated the flanged flywheel as two separate hollow cylinders and as far as I understand it, the moment of inertia about the axis of rotation is
I=1/2[m1(r12+r22)+m2(r22+r32)]
The mass is
M=πρ[h1(r22-r12)+h2(r32-r22)]
Due to design constraints r3=0.05m and h2 has a maximum size of 0.04m, due to the bearing I will be using r1 = 0.011 m and h1=0.007m. So the only variable is r2.
The material that i have been using is brass, ρ=8400kg/m3

1.png


I know I should be able to use calculus to solve it but I've never been able to apply it well, I've been chasing myself round in circles for days and just keep drawing blanks.
Any help or suggestions is greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've been using Excel to perform iterative calculations and then plotted the MOI and mass against r2.
resulting in this graph
2.png

I then tried to approximate where the slope of MOI dropped off significantly compared to the the slope of the mass.
Would this be an acceptable approximation?
 
Plot MOI/Mass vs R2.

Also you can use a subtraction to delete mass (ie lightning it) from the MOI and mass calcs. Assume that all the force acts on the radius of the COM of the deleted segment.
 
Last edited:
Hmmm...
I tried the MOI/mass vs. r2. The maximum point on the curve corresponded to r2 = 42.5 mm.
I then got the bearing resistances for that mass and MOI and plugged it into another excel spreadsheet to determine the maximum spin time it would achieve given initial velocity 1047 rad/sec.
It worked out at approximately 460 seconds. The values I approximated (r2 = 28 mm) worked out at about 550 seconds. When I initially wrote the equations for spin time I was trying to select a bearing, I used a best guess for r2 = 30 mm and it gives me a spin time of 700 sec!
Maybe I should have mentioned the fact that I'm using hybrid bearings, I was just reading through the manufacturers brochure again and realized that it called for a minimum radial load of 16.4 N (1.67kg) for my purposes.
The mass at r2 = 42.5 mm worked out as 1 kg. Would that make a big difference?
Also what did you mean by subtracting the mass?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top