Determining Propagation vector from E(x,y,t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter priceless
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propagation Vector
priceless
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



E(x,y,t)=(2i/sqrt(5)) + (j/sqrt(5)) Eo cos( 2pi(1/lamda)[2x/sqrt(5) - y/sqrt(5)]-[ft] )

Homework Equations


I Know k =2pi/lamda for 1D wave
I know K vetor=k dot r
I know K vector shows the direction of propogation, and must be perpendicular to E and B.

The Attempt at a Solution


Got 1/3 points on this part of my exam.
Kvector=2pi (1/lamda) [2/sqrt(5) - 1/sqrt(5)] * (2i/sqrt(5)) + (j/sqrt(5))
I know I have to check for normalizaton, and it is normalized.

Obviously this is wrong. I'm not sure how to define k for a multi dimensional wave, and my textbook does not show any example problems for 3 dimensional waves., or shows solutions for any multidimensional waves that involve K.Is the answer simply the resultant vector of kx and ky?
sqrt( (2/sqrt(5))^2 + (1/sqrt(5))^2)) which just equals sqrt(1)=1.

Edit: Referred back to Griffiths electrodynamics, and think I Figured it out.

K vector = K * r = (2pi/lamda) ( 2x^ / sqrt(5) - 1y^ / sqrt(5))
where x^ and y^ indicate the unit vectors xhat and yhat, not x to a power of ____.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your question?
I don't see what the problem statement is.
Also what are the meaning of those i and j, are those things quaternions?
What is the meaning of [ft]?
Four us and for yourself, take a little bit more time to explain your question properly.
 
Apologies, it was determine the propagation vector from this equation of a plane-polarized wave.
 
Within the cosine, you see something that depends on x,y and something that depends on t.
Propagation has something to do with following time development of points (lines, planes) with constant E through time. ## cos(\vec k \cdot \vec r - \omega t)## I seem to remember.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top