Determining Series vs. Parallel Configuration in Two-Capacitor Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter jg370
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a two-capacitor circuit, determining whether the capacitors are in series or parallel after closing the switch is crucial for calculating potential differences and stored energy. When the switch is closed, the capacitors are effectively connected in parallel, as they share the same voltage. However, they can also be viewed as being in series since they carry the same current. Applying lumped circuit theory and Kirchhoff’s Laws is essential for solving the problem accurately. Understanding these concepts will lead to the correct configuration analysis of the circuit.
jg370
This is most likely a well known problem. I think that I could deal with its basic aspects such as calculating the magnitude of the potential difference across each capacitor, the potential energy store in the two capacitor after the switch is close, ect, if I could determine whether the two capacitors are connected in series or in parallel once the switch is close.

If I treat the charged capacitor as an emf source, I am led to think that the two capacitors are connected in series. However, if I consider the arrangement as two capacitors, then I see them as paralllel connected.

Can anyone give me an idea how to determine whether the two capacitors are in series or in parallel once the switch is closed.

Refer to the following for a diagram of the circuit.

www.livemath.com/lmstorage/files/1086007595696[/URL]

Thank you for your help,

JG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
jg370,
When you close the switch the capacitors are connected in parallel.

Good luck
 
They are simultaneously in series (same current) and in parallel (same voltage).

The solution to the problem requires that you first recognize that the model likely being used is that of an “ideal” circuit (i.e., lumped circuit theory). In applying lumped circuit theory, we distinguish between the electrical properties (resistance, capacitance, and inductance) and physical circuit elements (resistor, capacitor, and inductor). If you bear that in mind, and then carefully apply Kirchoff’s Laws, you will arrive at the answer. (See the discussion http://www.ilovephysics.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi?action=forum&board=conceptdiscadv&op=display&num=50 ).

-Martin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top