Determining the equivalent resistence of a circuit

AI Thread Summary
To determine the equivalent resistance between points A and D, start by labeling the circuit and adding resistors one at a time to identify series and parallel configurations. A Δ-Y transformation can simplify the circuit, allowing the application of known formulas for equivalent resistance. If this transformation is not used, setting up a system of equations for voltage drops across each resistor is necessary. Attaching a hypothetical voltage source (e.g., 1 V) helps in calculating currents using Kirchhoff's laws, leading to the equivalent resistance. Following these steps, the correct equivalent resistance was found to be 7/12 Ω.
Eman 5

Homework Statement


I want to determine the equivalent resistance between A and D in the drawing below:
[/B]
yuVKS.jpg


Homework Equations


1/Req=1/R1+1/R2+1/R3+...
And
Req=R1+R2+R3+...

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really know how to simplify this drawing, I'm not sure if one resistor isn't calculated in this case. I determined the equivalent resistance of a similar circuit but the resistors in it were equal so, I don't calculate one of the resistor inside the triangle as the voltages at its two ends are equal.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eman 5 said:
I don't really know how to simplify this drawing
Start by labeling the two end points, A and D, in your new drawing. Then, build up the circuit by adding in each resistor one at a time. So to start, notice that the bottom resistor of ##1\Omega## connects straight from A to D. Next, notice the top two resistors of ##2\Omega## and ##1\Omega## are in series between A and D. Continue drawing in the other resistors and it should become more clear which resistors are in parallel and which are in series. It will just be a matter of applying the formulas for equivalent resistance thereafter.

EDIT: It looks like using a ##\Delta##-Y transformation for the Y branch will allow you to draw an equivalent circuit where you will be able to apply your known formulas for resistors in series and in parallel. Without this transformation, the problem is still easily solvable but you must set up a system of equations for the voltage drop across each resistor and solve the linear system.
 
Last edited:
While equations such as \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} for parallel and R_{eq} = R_1 + R_2 + R_3 for series configurations are often useful, they won't help you much here. You'll find that some resistors are neither completely parallel nor completely series. You need a different approach.

Attach a hypothetical voltage source between A and D. Give it some specified voltage, whatever you want. You might as well make it 1 V for convenience. Then solve for the currents in the circuit using KVL and/or KCL. You'll need 4 simultaneous equations and 4 unkowns.

With that you can calculate the current passing through the hypothetical voltage source. And at that point, since you know the voltage of the voltage source and the current passing through it, you can calculate the equivalent resistance of the circuit.

Edit: Oh, and @Eman 5, Welcome to Physics Forums (PF)! :welcome:
 
  • Like
Likes Eman 5
NFuller said:
EDIT: It looks like using a ##\Delta##-Y transformation for the Y branch will allow you to draw an equivalent circuit where you will be able to apply your known formulas for resistors in series and in parallel. Without this transformation, the problem is still easily solvable but you must set up a system of equations for the voltage drop across each resistor and solve the linear system.
Right, that's another approach that will work too, if you happen to know/remember the Y to \Delta (or \Delta to Y) transformation equations. :smile:
 
collinsmark said:
While equations such as \frac{1}{R_{eq}} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} for parallel and R_{eq} = R_1 + R_2 + R_3 for series configurations are often useful, they won't help you much here. You'll find that some resistors are neither completely parallel nor completely series. You need a different approach.

Attach a hypothetical voltage source between A and D. Give it some specified voltage, whatever you want. You might as well make it 1 V for convenience. Then solve for the currents in the circuit using KVL and/or KCL. You'll need 4 simultaneous equations and 4 unkowns.

With that you can calculate the current passing through the hypothetical voltage source. And at that point, since you know the voltage of the voltage source and the current passing through it, you can calculate the equivalent resistance of the circuit.
Thank you:smile:. I followed your steps and I could solve it. The equivalent resistance=7/12 Ω which is the correct answer shown in the book.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top