Deviation from Raoult's Law--Smith Van Ness Abbott

  • Thread starter Thread starter swmmr1928
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deviation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of Raoult's Law as presented in the book "Smith Van Ness Abbott," particularly regarding vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) in binary systems. It clarifies that while the liquid phase (P-x1) typically exhibits linear behavior under Raoult's Law at constant temperature, deviations can occur due to non-idealities, especially in the liquid phase. The P-y1 curve, representing the vapor phase, is inherently nonlinear, making deviations less apparent. The conversation emphasizes that both phases can show deviations from Raoult's Law, but the liquid phase is often the focus in discussions of linearity. Overall, understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately interpreting VLE data.
swmmr1928
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
The book I am reading, Smith Van Ness Abbott has several figures of Pressure vs Composition for Vapor Liquid Equilibrium of a Binary system. It often includes a dashed straight line to represent Raoult's Law.

What confuses me is that only the liquid phase ( P-x1 ) is said to exhibit deviations from the Raoult's Law-the dashed line. I have uploaded two pictures. In Figure 10.11, P-x1 is a straight line, characteristic of Raoult's Law. However, P-y1 is not a straight line.

Figure 12.5 is a graph of real VLE behavior. The P-x1 curve deviates from the dashed line, as does the P-y1 curve, which also was nonlinear in Raoult's Law system. From the book's description, only the liquid phase deviates from Raoult's law. And in a system obeying Raoult's Law, only the liquid phase has a linear P-x1 behavior. Am I understanding this correctly?
 

Attachments

  • Figure showing straight line liquid phase.jpg
    Figure showing straight line liquid phase.jpg
    58.5 KB · Views: 508
  • Figure showing liquid phase deviation.jpg
    Figure showing liquid phase deviation.jpg
    64.8 KB · Views: 454
Physics news on Phys.org
A conditional "yes." You might try applying Raoult's law without a condensed phase.
 
swmmr1928 said:
The book I am reading, Smith Van Ness Abbott has several figures of Pressure vs Composition for Vapor Liquid Equilibrium of a Binary system. It often includes a dashed straight line to represent Raoult's Law.

What confuses me is that only the liquid phase ( P-x1 ) is said to exhibit deviations from the Raoult's Law-the dashed line. I have uploaded two pictures. In Figure 10.11, P-x1 is a straight line, characteristic of Raoult's Law. However, P-y1 is not a straight line.
Your interpretation is not correct. In chapter 10, Smith and Van Ness make it clear that the system being considered obeys Raoult's law. Nowhere do they indicate that P-x "exhibits deviations from Raoult's Law" (whatever that means). For a system that obeys Raoult's law, a line of P (total pressure) vs x is a straight line at constant temperature. In the book, they give the simple algebra that leads to this result. Raoult's law is a combination thing, and there is no such thing as Raoult's law for a liquid alone.
Figure 12.5 is a graph of real VLE behavior. The P-x1 curve deviates from the dashed line, as does the P-y1 curve, which also was nonlinear in Raoult's Law system.
This is because of non-idealities in the liquid phase.
From the book's description, only the liquid phase deviates from Raoult's law.
There can also be non-idealities in the vapor phase causing deviations from Raoult's law, but maybe, for the case being considered (e.g., low pressure), the dominant factor is the liquid phase.

And in a system obeying Raoult's Law, only the liquid phase has a linear P-x1 behavior.
For constant temperature only.

Chet
 
I agree that Chapter 10 does not describe any examples with deviations from Raoult's Law. I was not clear in my first post.

Raoult's Law for Binary system at Constant Temperature
<br /> <br /> P_{t}(x)=P_{2}^{sat}+(P_{1}^{sat}-P_{2}^{sat})x_{1}<br /> \\<br /> P_{t}(y)=\frac{1}{y_{1}/P_{1}^{sat}+y_{2}/P_{2}^{sat}}<br /> <br />

I get it. Quite simply, Raoult's Law (at constant Temperature) is linear P-x1 but nonlinear for P-y1. That means that P-x1 deviations from Raoult's Law are immediately evident, but P-y1 are not. When viewing real VLE data, could the P-y1 curve from Raoult's Law also be plotted to see those deviations?
 
swmmr1928 said:
I agree that Chapter 10 does not describe any examples with deviations from Raoult's Law. I was not clear in my first post.

Raoult's Law for Binary system at Constant Temperature
<br /> <br /> P_{t}(x)=P_{2}^{sat}+(P_{1}^{sat}-P_{2}^{sat})x_{1}<br /> \\<br /> P_{t}(y)=\frac{1}{y_{1}/P_{1}^{sat}+y_{2}/P_{2}^{sat}}<br /> <br />

I get it. Quite simply, Raoult's Law (at constant Temperature) is linear P-x1 but nonlinear for P-y1. That means that P-x1 deviations from Raoult's Law are immediately evident, but P-y1 are not. When viewing real VLE data, could the P-y1 curve from Raoult's Law also be plotted to see those deviations?
Sure.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top