Diagonalization and Matrix similarity

Bertrandkis
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Question1 :
a) Show that if A is nonsingular and diagonalizable then A^-1 is diagonalizable
b) Show that if A is diagonalizable then A^T is diagonalizable

Question 2
Show that if A is similar to B and B similar to C, then A is similar to C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far? This is a straightforward application of the definitions.
 
Why are you doing a problem like this? If it is schoolwork (and it is certainly worded as such) then it should be in the "Homework and Schoolwork" section.

Also, you can't simply post a problem like this and expect someone else to give you the solution. Show what work you have done. Start, at the least, by quoting the definitions of "nonsingular", "diagonalizable", and "similar".
 
THIS IS WHAT I TRIED
Question1 :
a) Show that if A is nonsingular and diagonalizable then A^{-1} is diagonalizable

MY SOLUTION
If A is non singular then AA^{-1}=I
If A is diagonalizable if it's similar to a diagonal matrix => P^{-1}AP=D
which implies that AP=PD (1)
We need to show that A^{-1}P=PD ^{-1}

so multiply both sides of (1) by A^{-1} we have PA=PD (2)

then multiply both sides of (2) by D^{-1} we have D^{-1}P=A^{-1}P

Therefore A^{-1} is diagonalizable


Question 2
Show that if A is similar to B and B similar to C, then A is similar to C

MY SOLUTION
if A is similar to B then P^{-1}AP=B we can show that AP=PB(1)
if B is similar to C then P^{-1}BP=C (2)
now replace BP in equation (2)by (1) then P^{-1}AP=C
Therefore A is similar to C
 
Last edited:
For 1a, it's more useful to write A = PDP^-1, then it's clear what A^-1 has to be. b is the same idea.

For 2, write B = PAP^-1, C = QBQ^-1 (you can't use the same P for both), then the rest is pretty obvious.
 
Bertrandkis said:
THIS IS WHAT I TRIED
Question1 :
a) Show that if A is nonsingular and diagonalizable then A^{-1} is diagonalizable

MY SOLUTION
If A is non singular then AA^{-1}=I
If A is diagonalizable if it's similar to a diagonal matrix => P^{-1}AP=D
which implies that AP=PD (1)
We need to show that A^{-1}P=PD ^{-1}

so multiply both sides of (1) by A^{-1} we have PA=PD (2)

then multiply both sides of (2) by D^{-1} we have D^{-1}P=A^{-1}P
No. If you multiply PA= PD on the LEFT by D-1 you get D-1PA= D-1PD. If you multiply PA= PD on the RIGHT by D-1 you get PAD-1= P. Neither of those is, directly, D-1P= A-1. By the way, have you already proved that, if A is invertible and diagonlizable, the D is also invertible?

Therefore A^{-1} is diagonalizable


Question 2
Show that if A is similar to B and B similar to C, then A is similar to C

MY SOLUTION
if A is similar to B then P^{-1}AP=B we can show that AP=PB(1)
if B is similar to C then P^{-1}BP=C (2)
now replace BP in equation (2)by (1) then P^{-1}AP=C
You can't replace "BP" in (2) by (1)- (1) doesn't say anything about BP- it says that PB=AP. Also, of course, the "P" in your first two equationsis not necessairily the same!
Therefore A is similar to C
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top