The article in question is criticized for its lack of clarity and coherence, particularly regarding Einstein's views on black holes. The discussion highlights confusion over the author's interpretation of Einstein's beliefs, suggesting that the writing quality is subpar. Concerns are raised about the credibility of the publication, given its disclaimer about the views expressed. There is an interest in further investigating George Chapline and his work at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to clarify the article's claims. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for more reliable and comprehensible scientific communication.
That article is gibberish. For example, how is a reader to make sense of this:
According to the arguments posed by Chapline, Einstein did not believe in the existence of the black holes but added, 'Einstein could not explain the reason behind it'.
?
Added that looked too deeply into the site itself (this article reads as though it were written by a young child, so this may be an elementary school newspaper published online), but I did read the disclaimer at the bottom of the page stating that the views expressed in the articles are not necessarily those of the publication.
Perhaps some light could be shared out what the author was trying to get at by researching this Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory physicist "George Chapline", whom the article referenced. I'm going to surround around at Livermore (online) and see if I can find that name, and the work to which this article was referring.
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip
I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way?
The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Do we even know? My understanding of dark energy is that particles come into existence, exert and outward force, then vanish. My problem with that is how, of course, then how does dark energy know to push everything in the same direction? The pressure exerted would be in all directions, even if the space was moving so why isn't stuff pushed all over the sky?
Thanks - rev