Did I Calculate the Positron's Momentum Correctly in Pion Decay?

lee_sarah76
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We are the given the rare decay:

π+ → e+ + ve

Also, we are given mπ = 139.6 MeV/c2, mv ≈ 0, me+ = 0.511 MeV/c2

And we are given that the decay starts with the pion at rest, so I took that to mean that pπ = 0

Solve for the momentum of the positron.

Homework Equations



Conservation of Momentum
Conservation of Energy
E2 = (pc)2 + (mc)2
E = mc2

The Attempt at a Solution



I started with the fact that since the pion was at rest before decay, pπ = 0 so pe + pv = 0.

Then, also using the fact that the pion was at rest before decay I solved for its energy using the formula E = mc2, substituting mπ = 139.6 MeV/c2 getting that Ebefore = 139.6 MeV.

Ebefore = Eafter = Ee + Ev

(Ee)2 = (pec)2 + (mec2)2

And because the neutrino is massless:
Ev = pv*c

From before, since Ee + Ev = 139.6 MeV, I solved for Ee to get Ee =139.6 MeV - Ev.

Then I substituted pvc for Ev to get the equation:

(139.6 MeV - pvc)2 = (pec)2 + (mec2)2

The (pc)2 would cancel each other out, leaving:

-279.2pvc = -19487.8 MeV

So, pv = 69.799 MeV/c leaving pe = -69.799 MeV/c

My question is, is this right, or have I made some glaring mistakes in my method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good to me.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top